Compliance by Design & Lifecycle Control

01 / 10

A small cost-down change can disconnect the evidence

Which original report facts remain true when the module stays the same but its antenna and charger change?

The gateway passed through a carefully documented test campaign. Purchasing now proposes an antenna from another supplier and a cheaper charger. Both fit the existing connectors. The radio module and product name are unchanged. It is tempting to attach the old report to the new bill of materials and treat the decision as administrative.

But a report describes a specimen in a configuration, under a method and conditions. The antenna can change the radiated pattern, feed match and installation envelope. A supply can change conducted noise and the currents flowing along a cable. The original observation does not disappear; the connection between that observation and the new configuration needs review. That connection is the central object of this lesson.

Think about itThe certified radio module is unchanged. Can the antenna and charger change without reopening the host questions?

Answer

No blanket conclusion follows. First read the actual module integration envelope and the report’s antenna, supply, host, exposure and instruction scope. Some evidence may be reusable after a scoped comparison; other uses may require analysis, tests or different documents. The unchanged module record answers only its own question.

Illustrative case · one immutable record, two manifests

G02-LC is a named lifecycle study derived from G02/A1/P2/F-NA/wifi-node. Manifest SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1 retains the original antenna/feed and charger. The proposal creates v2 with ANT and PWR changes; it does not overwrite U5/U6 or the G02-NA-MA study from the preceding lessons.

The inherited teaching-node-v1 remains generic 2.450 GHz QPSK, 20 kbit/s information, 10 ksymbol/s, RRC roll-off 0.35 and 80 ksample/s at D3. Its named Wi-Fi gateway option still needs an exact standard, band, mode and concurrency definition. The teaching waveform is not automatically a Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, cellular or legally permitted mode.

A baseline is the versioned set of product facts, requirements, evidence uses and recorded decisions against which a change is assessed. It is useful precisely because a reviewer can reconstruct what was known before the change. Start with the configuration matrix and the module/host envelope rather than a generic product-name search.

Decision and record updateOpen SYN-CHANGE-ANT-PWR-v1 against baseline p09-m06-baseline-v1. Preserve the original artifacts. Record antenna construction/feed and supply/cable differences as questions, with an owner; do not silently broaden the report scope.

02 / 10

Put compliance questions into requirements early

Which design choices should a future compliance question constrain today?

A requirement becomes useful when it reaches a controlled design variable. “Global compliance” cannot select a filter, a region image or a mounting distance. A dated, jurisdiction-specific question can identify the operating modes, antenna options and installation conditions that a design must support or prevent. Unresolved applicability belongs in the requirements record rather than in a guessed universal limit budget.

Follow 05.1’s requirement discipline: distinguish a product need, an engineering allocation and verified evidence. NEED-08 and C-MARKET remain parent questions. The compliance lead establishes the real source and activity; RF and firmware leads translate the resulting constraints into interfaces and controlled modes. A design budget is not a new legal threshold.

Early traceability example · proposed controls, not universal requirements
Question	Design control	Verification / unresolved fact
Which radio/mode/market combinations exist?	Region image, channel/power controls, recovery behavior, concurrency exclusions	Capture reachable RF states, including reset/update; actual national mode/category remains unknown.
What carries unwanted energy out of the host?	Supply filtering, shielding continuity, reference-clock routing and cable interface	Compare loaded supply/host states; identify the relevant conducted/radiated method.
What antenna/installation envelope is represented?	Antenna assembly, feed and mounting identity; installation instructions	Mounted RF behavior and exposure/use comparison; nominal gain alone cannot close it.
What must survive a software update?	Radio calibration, signed region settings, control limits and telemetry hooks	Trace code/configuration to actual RF behavior; separate security and RF review.

The causal links are engineering hypotheses with evidence needs. 06.3’s integration variables explain why a feed or enclosure belongs in the manifest. 07.7’s coexistence review keeps permitted and restricted simultaneous states explicit. Neither lesson supplies a worldwide compliance limit.

Decision and record updateAdd SYN-REQ-LC-01: named markets, intended activity/date, controls, representative mode and unresolved applicability. Keep a proposed single-radio restriction visible until concurrency evidence and the responsible jurisdiction review support a broader plan.

03 / 10

Assign evidence and decision authority

Separate the person who produces evidence from the role that decides how it may be used. The RF engineer can explain a changed antenna’s consequences. A laboratory can report what it tested. A conformity-assessment body has a defined scope and procedure. The manufacturer or other responsible actor has jurisdiction-specific obligations. None of these roles can be substituted by a populated spreadsheet row.

Each reviewed claim needs a source/version and locator, applicability rationale, controlled design variable, verification method, evidence owner, decision rule and review trigger. Keep applicability, evidence maturity, scope match, source freshness and legal validity in separate fields. A formal report can be out of scope; a pre-scan can guide a redesign while the formal question stays open. “Not applicable” requires an explicit reviewed reason; unknown is not an exemption.

Responsibility map · five separate jurisdiction questions
Jurisdiction / source	Actor / documentary question	Decision still needed
EU · RED Articles 10, 21	Manufacturer tracks design/specification changes and maintains documentation.	Actual essential requirements, conformity route, national context and actor release.
CH · TIO Articles 14, 16	Swiss documentation and responsible-role conditions; series retention trigger has its own wording.	Swiss source, actor, procedure and national-use scope.
GB · OPSS guidance §4	Manufacturer production/documentation obligations; direct legislation recheck remains open.	Actual GB route, current legislative annotations and marking eligibility; NI is separate.
US · §§2.938, 2.1043	Responsible-party records and grantee/change scope.	Applicable authorization/change classification, amendment status and TCB review.
CA · RSP-100 §§10–11	Certificate holder, product/firmware/host identity and Canadian change procedure.	Actual applicable RSSs, certificate/CB conditions and release decision.

Illustrative case · a row is not a decision

SYN-CLAIM-ANT-EU-v1 asks whether one RF question can use the v2 antenna comparison. Its antenna lead owns the physical explanation; the document owner links the exact manifest and evidence; the jurisdiction reviewer establishes the applicable requirement. The supplied RP2 packet later resolves only this fictional question. Exposure and other markets remain separate.

Decision and record updateRecord an evidence-producing owner, engineering reviewer and actual actor question separately. Add the method-specific decision rule before interpreting a margin; a generic uncertainty interval does not replace the applicable procedure.

04 / 10

Build representative test modes and hooks

A test hook is a controlled way to put a product into an observable state. It may select a channel, request a modulation, sustain a burst, expose telemetry or hold a repeatable traffic load. Its value is reproducibility. Its danger is producing a radio state that the production device cannot reach—or hiding one that it can.

Document the relation between test and production images. If a test image bypasses calibration, changes output power, disables coexistence scheduling or extends on-time, say so and explain why that state represents the question being tested. Telemetry should help confirm the actual state, including commands, supply, timing and recovery behavior. A log of the requested power is weaker than evidence of the RF behavior achieved.

SYN-TEST-HOOKS-v1 · controlled mode manifest
Hook / identity	Representative rationale	Required record
SYN-TEST-G02-v1 ↔ production image	Channel and power-command control using the production calibration path	Image IDs, configuration diff and reachable-state comparison; equivalence not assumed.
Repeated 256-symbol bursts	Observe the 25.6 ms generic QPSK burst and stated on-time measurement gate	Actual burst spacing, duty and scheduling; sustained test behavior distinguished from field traffic.
Wi-Fi + node traffic request	Challenge the intended concurrency restriction	Per-radio state/timing, collisions and control failures. A single-radio report cannot fill the gap.
SYN-FIXTURE-LC-v1	Repeatable feed, supply and debug access without unexplained RF-path changes	Cable/termination identity, loss, safe access and any enclosure opening or fixture loading.

Keep physical test execution under Path 08’s lab practice. Verify safe access and equipment limits before energising hardware. This lesson produces a traceable plan, not live instrument commands. Canadian report requirements also make specimen and test configuration identity material; read the current RSS-Gen §§8.1–8.2 for the actual report question.

Common misconceptionSoftware-only changes cannot affect RF.

Radio commands, calibration, clocks, duty and scheduling can change RF behavior. A security patch may be independent of them, but that is a scoped reviewed conclusion, not a property of the word “software.”

Decision and record updateStore SYN-TEST-RELATION-v1 with production/test images, controls, observed state and deviations. Keep radio-state equivalence unknown until the comparison supports it; do not relabel a convenience test image as production.

05 / 10

Freeze the sample and record deviations

A “golden” sample is useful only when its origin and representativeness are known. An unusually well-tuned prototype may hide production variation. A unit repaired in the lab may no longer match the released bill of materials. Freeze enough identity that a later reviewer can distinguish the intended baseline from the actual specimen.

Move from exploratory prototype/pre-scan work to a formal configuration freeze deliberately. Preserve specimen/serial identity, assembly revision, firmware/region, antenna/feed, supply/accessories and installation. Record the calibrated setup and environmental state. A deviation is not necessarily a bad experiment; an undocumented deviation makes it difficult to know what the result supports.

Illustrative case · a charger swap halfway through testing

SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01 starts with P2-v1. A replacement supply is installed after a cable fault. Keep the earlier observations linked to the original configuration; create SYN-DEVIATION-LC-01 for the replacement, reason, time, affected measurements and reviewer. Subsequent data point to the changed specimen state. Do not replace the supply entry on the first report page and make both halves appear identical.

The report reviewer checks whether the supply change influences the relevant emissions or radio result and which tests need a representative repeat. A scope conflict stays visible beside other unknowns; it does not erase them.

Freeze sequence · evidence produced at each step
Stage	Evidence record	Consequence
Prototype / pre-scan	Hypothesis, setup and exploratory observations	Guides design; does not close an unrelated formal obligation.
Configuration freeze	Manifest, specimen/serial, BOM, images and representative rationale	Defines the population the sample is intended to represent.
Acquisition	Method/version, calibration, settings, environment and deviations	Preserves what was actually measured and under which conditions.
Report / scope review	Raw-to-derived links, uncertainty/decision rule and accepted scope	Separates a reported value from a claim about another configuration.

Decision and record updateRetain SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01 and each deviation as immutable history. Create a changed manifest before using changed-state data. Assign production representativeness and variation review; the label “golden” supplies neither.

06 / 10

Index the complete documentary baseline

A technical-document index connects the pieces of an argument. It should let a reviewer start at an actual requirement, find the controlled design and specimen, inspect the evidence and understand the decision. A directory full of PDFs may contain every filename yet still miss an applicable obligation or a configuration relation.

Keep the index versioned alongside risk analysis, standards/source editions, calculations, reports and raw evidence. Declaration, label and instruction workflows use these records, but their approval belongs to the relevant actors. RED Article 21 calls for documentation before placement and continuing updates; the Swiss OFCOM documentation guidance ties its scope to design, production and operation. These are source-specific obligations, not proof that this internal index is legally sufficient. Read the RED provision.

SYN-DOC-INDEX-LC-v1 · complete documentary questions
Index entry	Identity / owner	Question still requiring evidence
Configuration and design	SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1; configuration lead	Which BOM, radio state, antenna/accessory and specimen does each artifact cover?
Requirement and risk analysis	SYN-REQ-LC-01 / SYN-RISK-LC-v1; jurisdiction lead	Which actual requirement, activity and foreseeable use are applicable?
Report / raw / derived evidence	SYN-ART-ERF-v1 and four documentary artifacts; test lead	Do method, uncertainty, units, reference plane and conditions support this claim?
Source / method versions	Actual cards below; synthetic rules stored separately	Which citation, restriction, activity and transition support current use?
Declaration / label / instructions	SYN-DOC-RECONCILIATION-v2; document owner	Do actual language, actor, identification and installation conditions match the product?
Retention / retrieval	Jurisdiction actor + record custodian	Which record, actor, legal trigger and ongoing activity determine retention?

Do not use one global “report expiry” field. For example, Swiss Article 16 has actor and series conditions; the current RSS-Gen §8.1 ties test-report retention to the listed continuing activities. An internal review date can be overdue while a historical report still records its observation accurately. Actual retention and availability duties require their own source review.

Go deeperArtifact identity and custody are different from causal influence

The graph’s ERF node is an evidence use, distinct from SYN-ART-ERF-v1. A component change can challenge that use. It cannot change the old artifact’s content. The custody map identifies which record and manifest a use points to; it does not assert a physical dependency.

SYN-ART-ERF-v1

id: SYN-ART-ERF-v1
version: v1
use: ERF
parentIds: [ "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A" ]
identity: Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1
sample: SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01
method: SYN-METHOD-ERF-v1
source: SYN-REQUIREMENT-ERF-v1
kind: Illustrative derived measurement record
rawOrDerived: Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record
date: 2026-09-08
result: Internal exercise: on-time mean 19.3 dBm at R1-TX, real matched 50 Ω; 2.450 GHz generic QPSK; gate 2.0–23.6 ms within 25.6 ms burst; direct integrating power sensor, RBW/VBW/distance not applicable to this conducted exercise
uncertainty: U=0.4 dB, synthetic expanded uncertainty k=2; no statistical confidence claimed without distribution information
decisionRule: Internal inclusive interval-containment screen y+U≤19.7 dBm; not regulatory
reviewer: Supplied fictional baseline record
scope: ERF use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.
currentUse: Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten

SYN-ART-EEMC-v1

id: SYN-ART-EEMC-v1
version: v1
use: EEMC
parentIds: []
identity: Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1
sample: SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01
method: SYN-METHOD-EEMC-v1
source: SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEMC-v1
kind: Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied
rawOrDerived: Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record
date: 2026-09-08
result: No numerical test result
uncertainty: No technical value / decision interval supplied
decisionRule: Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail
reviewer: Supplied fictional baseline record
scope: EEMC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.
currentUse: Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten

SYN-ART-EEXP-v1

id: SYN-ART-EEXP-v1
version: v1
use: EEXP
parentIds: []
identity: Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1
sample: SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01
method: SYN-METHOD-EEXP-v1
source: SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEXP-v1
kind: Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied
rawOrDerived: Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record
date: 2026-09-08
result: No numerical test result
uncertainty: No technical value / decision interval supplied
decisionRule: Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail
reviewer: Supplied fictional baseline record
scope: EEXP use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.
currentUse: Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten

SYN-ART-ESEC-v1

id: SYN-ART-ESEC-v1
version: v1
use: ESEC
parentIds: []
identity: Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1
sample: SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01
method: SYN-METHOD-ESEC-v1
source: SYN-REQUIREMENT-ESEC-v1
kind: Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied
rawOrDerived: Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record
date: 2026-09-08
result: No numerical test result
uncertainty: No technical value / decision interval supplied
decisionRule: Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail
reviewer: Supplied fictional baseline record
scope: ESEC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.
currentUse: Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten

SYN-ART-EDOC-v1

id: SYN-ART-EDOC-v1
version: v1
use: EDOC
parentIds: []
identity: Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1
sample: SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01
method: SYN-METHOD-EDOC-v1
source: SYN-REQUIREMENT-EDOC-v1
kind: Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied
rawOrDerived: Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record
date: 2026-09-08
result: No numerical test result
uncertainty: No technical value / decision interval supplied
decisionRule: Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail
reviewer: Supplied fictional baseline record
scope: EDOC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.
currentUse: Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten

Custody map · not causal edges

custody: [ { "artifact": "SYN-ART-ERF-v1", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "evidenceUse": "ERF", "relation": "Identity / custody reference; not a physical influence edge" }, { "artifact": "SYN-ART-EEMC-v1", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "evidenceUse": "EEMC", "relation": "Identity / custody reference; not a physical influence edge" }, { "artifact": "SYN-ART-EEXP-v1", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "evidenceUse": "EEXP", "relation": "Identity / custody reference; not a physical influence edge" }, { "artifact": "SYN-ART-ESEC-v1", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "evidenceUse": "ESEC", "relation": "Identity / custody reference; not a physical influence edge" }, { "artifact": "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "evidenceUse": "EDOC", "relation": "Identity / custody reference; not a physical influence edge" } ]

Decision and record updatePublish SYN-DOC-INDEX-LC-v2 as a proposed index revision with parent v1, open scope gaps and record custodians. Preserve source dates independently: publication, entry into force, application/transition, actual access, evaluation and review due.

07 / 10

Follow physical and software change paths

How far does a change travel—and what would justify stopping the investigation?

A directed dependency means that changing upstream facts can require review of a downstream use. ANT reaches radio performance, exposure/installation and documentation. PWR reaches host/supply emissions and documentation. The shared EDOC node is counted once, but both reasons remain. The union is four evidence uses, twenty questions and five dossiers. ESEC and Q-EU-ADD have no known path from this pair within the supplied reviewed boundary.

Reachability identifies review questions. It does not choose a retest method, a permissive-change class or a legal release. Compare the actual changed facts and evidence before deciding which analysis, representative test, document reconciliation, source recheck, specialist review or proposed restriction is appropriate. FCC change conditions are specific to the actual equipment and change; §2.1043 does not create a universal software exemption.

Think about itThe enclosure change is described as cosmetic, but its pigment’s RF properties are unknown. Is it a no-impact change?

Answer

No. Composition, conductivity, dielectric loss, thickness and the mounted antenna response may matter. ENC therefore reaches ERF and EEXP in this synthetic graph: ten questions and five dossiers. Request material and controlled integration evidence before replacing unknown with reviewed independence.

All eight changes · analysis, test and document questions
Event	Causal mechanism	Actions / required evidence
ANTAntenna supplier	Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain.	Analyze mounted antenna and feed; Assess RF/exposure representative retest needs; Reconcile antenna and installation documentsSupplier construction/material/variation records; mounted comparison; exposure/installation rationale; exact permitted antenna and instruction scope.Antenna / integration lead + exposure specialist
FWPower-control firmware	Power, scheduling and radio commands can alter RF, exposure, security controls and configuration documents.	Analyze power/timing and recovery controls; Assess RF/exposure/security verification; Reconcile image, region and user-document referencesCode/configuration diff and actual state capture; method-specific uncertainty; review of secure update and restrictions.Firmware lead + RF / security reviewers
PWRCharger / supply	Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes.	Compare emissions and loaded supply states; Assess representative EMC retest; Reconcile accessory and document scopeSupply schematic/switching/load comparison, cable routing and host traffic, report configuration, accessory list.EMC lead + configuration owner
ENCEnclosure pigment	A cosmetic label does not establish unchanged dielectric loss, conductivity or mounted antenna behavior.	Obtain material and geometry evidence; Assess mounted RF/exposure testsComposition, thickness and tolerances; controlled mounted comparison; installation consequences.Mechanical / materials lead + antenna reviewer
CLKReference clock	Frequency error, clock harmonics and mixing products connect radio performance and host emissions.	Analyze tolerance and interference paths; Assess channel/temperature and emissions testsClock spectrum/tolerance over operating conditions, coupling path, mode matrix and controlled comparison.Clock / RF lead + EMC reviewer
SECSecurity patch	Security behavior changes; whether radio commands/timing also changed is a separate conditional question.	Review security behavior; Resolve radio-control/timing relation; Assess supplementary tests only for supported mechanismsDependency/call-graph and scheduling diff; command/state capture. SYN-SEC-INDEPENDENT-v1 is a supplied scoped premise only.Security lead + firmware / RF reviewer
SRC-EU-CITATIONEU citation update	Current source support for EU RF and selected additional questions changes; raw ERF/ESEC artifacts do not.	Recheck exact source, activity and transition; Assess supplementary evidence needs; Reconcile declaration / route questionsActual official edition/citation/restrictions, activity/date and product applicability; no automatic expiry.EU source / conformity route reviewer
WORDINGInternal administrative wording	No technical path only if SYN-WORDING-REVIEW-v1 confirms no product, instruction, safety, label or configuration meaning change.	Read the complete scoped wording comparison; Version internal note; investigate if coverage missingSupplied fictional text diff and scope review. No inference from an empty edge set.Document owner + configuration reviewer

A margin belongs to the measured configuration

Consider an internal upper-limit exercise, not a regulatory criterion. The illustrative v1 on-time mean is y = 19.3 dBm at R1-TX, expanded uncertainty U = 0.4 dB, and internal inclusive upper limit L = 19.7 dBm. Use the declared Path 08 interval-containment screen: the complete interval must lie at or below L.

$y + U = 19.3 + 0.4 = 19.7 \mathrm{dBm} = L$ v1 interval [18.9, 19.7] dBm · contained at equality

Power-control firmware predicts an on-time level increase of +0.5 dB. That gives a prediction of 19.8 dBm. If U were provisionally unchanged, the interval would be [19.4,20.2] dBm. It straddles 19.7 dBm, so the internal screen is inconclusive. The old measurement cannot be relabelled as a v2 measurement, and the uncertainty may need reassessment.

$19.8 \pm 0.4 \to [19.4, 20.2] \mathrm{dBm}$ Predicted case · inconclusive; not a measured pass/fail or a legal nonconformity finding

JCGM 106 §§8.2–8.3 distinguishes decision rules; NIST TN 1297 §6 explains expanded uncertainty. A real evaluation imports the actual method, statistic, plane, bandwidth/detector where relevant, uncertainty and required decision rule. This example uses exact integer tenths for decisions; display rounding cannot change equality.

Go deeperIndependently checked affected sets and boundary cases

Hand-derived event counterexamples · known evidence / questions / dossiers
Case	Known evidence set / counts	Interpretation
Antenna + charger	EDOC, EEMC, EEXP, ERF4 / 20 / 5	review requiredPotential-only: ∅
Reference clock	EEMC, ERF2 / 10 / 5	review requiredPotential-only: ∅
Unknown pigment	EEXP, ERF2 / 10 / 5	review requiredPotential-only: ∅
Power-control firmware	EDOC, EEXP, ERF, ESEC4 / 16 / 5	review requiredPotential-only: ∅
EU citation only	∅0 / 2 / 1	review requiredPotential-only: ∅
Security: unknown RF relation	ESEC1 / 1 / 1	review requiredPotential-only: ERF, M-CA, M-CH, M-GB, M-US, Q-CA-RF, Q-CH-RF, Q-EU-RF, Q-GB-RF, Q-US-RF
Security: known RF relation	ERF, ESEC2 / 6 / 5	review requiredPotential-only: ∅
Security: reviewed independent	ESEC1 / 1 / 1	review requiredPotential-only: ∅
Reviewed internal wording	∅0 / 0 / 0	unchanged within reviewed scopePotential-only: ∅
Unreviewed internal wording	∅0 / 0 / 0	review requiredPotential-only: ∅

SEC unknown keeps ESEC → Q-EU-ADD → M-EU known while ERF and five RF questions remain potential. M-EU has an additional uncertain RF mechanism, but is already known. A reviewed independent radio relation removes only that uncertain branch.

No-change and reviewed WORDING require explicit SYN-COVERAGE-v1; an unmodeled component requires discovery. The declared graph is acyclic and bounded. Dangling endpoints, impossible identities and cycles reject without evaluating closure.

Decision and record updateCreate the candidate manifest and an assessment against it. Link new evidence IDs to the old artifacts; never edit raw results or silently substitute a method edition. Record which evidence could justify reuse, further tests or a retained restriction.

08 / 10

Watch external sources without rewriting history

External surveillance is another form of change control. A new law, official standards citation, method, regulator guidance or portal instruction can affect a particular use of the evidence. Publication, supersession, withdrawal, the end of a transition and an overdue editorial review are different events. Neither “newer” nor “older” settles the current activity-specific question.

Think about itA new official citation appears. Does an unchanged old measurement become a new measurement—or automatically become void?

Answer

Neither. Preserve the original report and method. Review the current activity/date, the exact cited edition and any restrictions or transition. Current use may need supplementary evidence or declaration/route review while the historical measurement remains intact. Other jurisdictions do not inherit the EU conclusion.

Illustrative case · source changes bypass raw evidence

SRC-EU-CITATION points directly to Q-EU-RF and Q-EU-ADD, then M-EU. It reaches zero evidence-use nodes, two questions and one market, and rewrites no raw artifact. The graph leaves the other markets untouched unless a separate dependency is declared.

The actual Commission radio-equipment index now lists an amendment dated 4 September 2026. The linked act’s operative text could not be reverified during this session. Its annex/transition is therefore an explicit source-review question, not a fictional new requirement. The synthetic SRC event makes no claim about which real product that amendment affects.

Static surveillance calendar · fictional owner, due and trigger
Owner / source family	Review due	Earlier review trigger
EU source reviewerLaw / official citation / restrictions	2026-12-07	New material citation event: recheck immediately even before the scheduled date; Q-EU-RF / Q-EU-ADD
CH source reviewerSwiss TIO / OFCOM designation / national interface	2026-12-07	A Swiss source change opens its own dossier; an EU event is not silently propagated
GB source reviewerGB legislation / designated method / guidance	2026-12-07	Activity, territory or marking support changes; NI remains a separate prior study
US / CA source reviewersRule / RSS / RSP / adopted method / grant scope	2026-12-07	Change provisions, actual record or method scope changes; preserve separate US and CA decisions
Process / document ownerSubmission portal and document instructions	2026-12-07	Portal migration changes connected process/document dependencies only; discover a new edge before evaluating

The frozen exercise is evaluated on 2026-09-08 and is current through 2026-12-07. On 2026-12-08 it requires a source recheck. This one-day difference changes editorial freshness, not grant validity. A newly detected material change triggers a targeted review even before the scheduled date. A portal migration affects only connected process/document uses; do not invent a technical retest edge from a new website address.

Common misconceptionThe source review due date is the approval expiry date.

Review due is an internal maintenance trigger. Legal validity, statutory transition and the historical meaning of a report require separate sources, activities and dates.

Decision and record updateAdd source owner, locator, status and trigger to the calendar. Retain the prior source version and the rationale for its historical use. Record unread new text as unresolved; a future announced application date is allowed, but a future “already reviewed” attestation is invalid.

09 / 10

Connect production and field evidence to action

A field complaint connects lifecycle control to an actual population. The first job is to preserve the report and identify the affected configuration, not to infer a cause from the customer’s description. Product revision, firmware, antenna, supply, installation and operating state can determine whether the complaint relates to the baseline, the changed proposal or an unrecorded variant.

Ask a qualified responsible role whether the available facts require prompt containment, investigation or other action under the applicable jurisdiction. Risk and nonconformity follow-up appear in RED Article 10(11–12), Swiss Articles 23–24, GB guidance §4 and the specific FCC §2.937 mechanism. These provisions have different actors and conditions. This lesson does not assign a universal notification deadline or decide a recall.

SYN-FIELD-LC-01 · bounded complaint and investigation record
Record field	Supplied fact / next question
Observation / evidence	Illustrative complaint: gateway loses reception when a replacement charger is connected. No calibrated measurement or legal failure established.
Population / owner	G02-LC revision and supply lot unknown. Quality/configuration owner obtains serial, assembly, image, accessory and distribution population.
Containment question	Product compliance lead and responsible jurisdiction actor assess risk and applicable response. No silent no-impact disposition while scope is unknown.
Investigation	Preserve original setup and observations. RF/EMC lead separates supply interference, voltage behavior and unrelated ambient causes using controlled comparisons.
Corrective action / verification	Link any revised component/software/instructions to a new manifest, evidence and representative population. Reproduce the original symptom and check the proposed correction plus regressions.
Open decision	Who is affected, which actual requirement applies, what evidence supports the cause and which actor determines the response?

Use 08.6’s evidence-closure discipline: one successful intervention is not a complete closure record. A correction can remove the symptom while leaving an untested mode or production variation. Preserve competing explanations, failed experiments and remaining restrictions; do not erase history after the preferred hypothesis wins.

Decision and record updateLink SYN-FIELD-LC-01 to the affected population and current evidence-use questions. Assign containment review, investigation, corrective-action evidence and verification separately. A pending action with an owner and date is still pending.

10 / 10

Chair the change board and defend the baseline

Chair the review around the configuration and evidence, not the desired delivery date. First ask each discipline what changed and which old report facts remain true. Next trace known and potential impacts. Only then compare the supplied reviews and decide what engineering proposal the record can support. Actual conformity, actor release and authority actions stay distinct.

Begin with ANT+PWR and predict four evidence uses. Inspect the duplicate EDOC paths, apply RP1 and notice that RF, EMC and exposure remain open. RP2 resolves one EU RF question only. RP3 contains traceable fictional combined conclusions for the twenty declared questions; those are synthetic reviewed premises, not invented measured test data.

Three bounded review packets · no automatic blanket closure
Packet / scope	Engineering progress	Still open
RP1 · ANT+PWR, v2	Five EDOC question reviews	Fifteen RF/EMC/exposure questions; actual actors and legal route
RP2 · ANT+PWR, v2	Q-EU-RF only	Nineteen other affected questions, including exposure
RP3 · ANT+PWR, v2	Twenty scoped synthetic engineering reviews	Actual applicability, evidence, conformity and actor release decisions remain external

Switch to source-only, then SEC unknown and reviewed independence. Compare reviewed and unreviewed WORDING. Filter to EU: the all-market affected set must remain fixed. Change the manifest or event-record version after selecting RP3: its old attestations remain historical and no longer close the new proposal. Reset restores the original facts, dates and review metadata.

Illustrative engineering case · Class 1

Compliance Change-Impact Graph

Predict what the antenna and charger disconnect. Follow each evidence use to its question, then examine what each fictional review packet actually resolves.

This bounded exercise supports engineering source/evidence review. It does not decide legal applicability or authorize a product. Actual conformity routes, actor release, filings and any field-response duties remain with the relevant qualified specialists.

Compare a supplied change

Preset · restores all defining facts

Changed facts · select up to eight

SEC → ERF relationship

Graph scope review

WORDING scope review

Changed evidence / configuration scope

Supplied fictional review packet

Synthetic source-review case

Changed manifest versionRP1–RP3 cover v2 only. Baseline and changed manifests are available below.

Changed-facts record versionChanging the event record keeps old reviews historical until reconciled.

Evaluation date · UTCYYYY-MM-DD. Default 2026-09-08; no browser clock.

Source review due · inclusive UTCDefault 2026-12-07. Overdue the next day; this is not legal expiry.

View only · all-market scope stays fixed

Market view

Evidence view

compliance-change-impact/2.0 · p09-m06-impact-rules-v1

Committed assessment · Canonical ANT + PWR

review required

Baseline p09-m06-baseline-v1; event record p09-m06-change-events-v1; edge version p09-m06-edges-v1. Evaluation 2026-09-08; supplied access/review 2026-09-08 / 2026-09-08; editorial due 2026-12-07, inclusive. These are synthetic dates.

4 known evidence uses · 20 known questions · 5 known dossiers
0 additional potential evidence uses · 0 potential questions · 0 additional potential dossiers
0 engineering question reviews recorded · 0 raw artifacts rewritten

Known evidence set: EDOC, EEMC, EEXP, ERF. Known dossiers: M-CA, M-CH, M-EU, M-GB, M-US. Potential-only nodes: ∅. Nodes with an uncertain mechanism even if also known: ∅.

Illustrative dependency graph, not measured RF data. Solid / dashed / thin outlines encode known / potential / no reached evidence-use path. Source dependencies act on questions, not raw reports. Missing graph coverage still requires discovery.

Immutable baseline / current proposal

Manifest v2 remains a proposal. Preserve the v1 baseline and all unresolved decisions.

Committed baseline-to-change diff
Changed fact	Baseline v1	Candidate v2
ANT	SYN-A1-v1 / 0.20 m SYN-COAX-v1	SYN-A1-SUPPLIER-B-v2 / feed retained, equivalence unreviewed
PWR	SYN-P2-v1	SYN-P2-SUPPLIER-B-v2; switching/cable behavior unknown

Inspect baseline manifest v1 · immutable

id: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1
parentId: SYN-MAN-G02-A1-P2-F-NA-wifi-node-v1
scenario: teaching-node-v1
sku: G02
hardware: SYN-HW-G02-v1
firmware: SYN-FW-G02-F-NA-v1
region: F-NA
radios: Node: generic 2.450 GHz QPSK; 20 kbit/s information, 10 ksymbol/s, RRC α=0.35, 80 ksample/s D3; no standardized mode inferred. Named Wi-Fi option: exact standard, band/channel, power, bandwidth and duty unknown.
mode: wifi-node
concurrent: true
antenna: A1
antennaVersion: SYN-A1-v1
cable: External coax SYN-COAX-v1, 0.20 m; pattern/gain/loss evidence unknown
enclosure: SYN-ENC-G02-v1
supply: P2
supplyVersion: SYN-P2-v1
installation: SYN-INSTALL-v1: indoor fixed bracket proposed; separation, mobility during service and outdoor use unresolved
user: SYN-USER-v1: technician installer and general end user proposed; access/service conditions unresolved
environment: 25 °C bench identity only; operational temperature, humidity and foreseeable environment unresolved
sample: SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01
regionControl: SYN-REGION-v1: four build images exist; signed configuration, recovery and forbidden-state reachability evidence unknown
testImageRelation: SYN-TEST-v1 mapped to production image ID; radio-state equivalence and command limits need reviewer evidence
study: G02-LC: five-market lifecycle comparison, derived from G02; no regional suitability asserted
clock: SYN-CLK-v1
security: SYN-SEC-v1
sourceVersion: SYN-EU-CITATION-v1
internalNote: SYN-INTERNAL-NOTE-v1

Inspect changed manifest v2 · proposal

id: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v2
parentId: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1
scenario: teaching-node-v1
sku: G02
hardware: SYN-HW-G02-v1
firmware: SYN-FW-G02-F-NA-v1
region: F-NA
radios: Node: generic 2.450 GHz QPSK; 20 kbit/s information, 10 ksymbol/s, RRC α=0.35, 80 ksample/s D3; no standardized mode inferred. Named Wi-Fi option: exact standard, band/channel, power, bandwidth and duty unknown.
mode: wifi-node
concurrent: true
antenna: A1
antennaVersion: SYN-A1-SUPPLIER-B-v2
cable: External coax SYN-COAX-v1, 0.20 m; pattern/gain/loss evidence unknown
enclosure: SYN-ENC-G02-v1
supply: P2
supplyVersion: SYN-P2-SUPPLIER-B-v2
installation: SYN-INSTALL-v1: indoor fixed bracket proposed; separation, mobility during service and outdoor use unresolved
user: SYN-USER-v1: technician installer and general end user proposed; access/service conditions unresolved
environment: 25 °C bench identity only; operational temperature, humidity and foreseeable environment unresolved
sample: SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01
regionControl: SYN-REGION-v1: four build images exist; signed configuration, recovery and forbidden-state reachability evidence unknown
testImageRelation: SYN-TEST-v1 mapped to production image ID; radio-state equivalence and command limits need reviewer evidence
study: G02-LC: five-market lifecycle comparison, derived from G02; no regional suitability asserted
clock: SYN-CLK-v1
security: SYN-SEC-v1
sourceVersion: SYN-EU-CITATION-v1
internalNote: SYN-INTERNAL-NOTE-v1

Questions and their own market dossiers

View: all markets / all evidence. Filtering changes visible rows only; all 21 questions remain in the model and print. ESEC contains only the selected EU additional question. Other security duties are outside the fixture, not inapplicable.

All 21 question scopes; filtered on screen only
Question → dossier	Impact / evidence use	Source support	Engineering disposition
`Q-CA-DOC`→ M-CA · EDOC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-CA-EMC`→ M-CA · EEMC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-CA-EXP`→ M-CA · EEXP	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-CA-RF`→ M-CA · ERF	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-CH-DOC`→ M-CH · EDOC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-CH-EMC`→ M-CH · EEMC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-CH-EXP`→ M-CH · EEXP	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-CH-RF`→ M-CH · ERF	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-EU-ADD`→ M-EU · ESEC	unchanged within reviewed scopehistorical artifact unchanged	within synthetic review date	unchanged within reviewed scopeExact SYN-COVERAGE-v1 boundary; no legal conclusion.
`Q-EU-DOC`→ M-EU · EDOC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-EU-EMC`→ M-EU · EEMC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-EU-EXP`→ M-EU · EEXP	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-EU-RF`→ M-EU · ERF	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-GB-DOC`→ M-GB · EDOC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-GB-EMC`→ M-GB · EEMC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-GB-EXP`→ M-GB · EEXP	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-GB-RF`→ M-GB · ERF	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-US-DOC`→ M-US · EDOC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-US-EMC`→ M-US · EEMC	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-US-EXP`→ M-US · EEXP	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.
`Q-US-RF`→ M-US · ERF	knowncurrent use pending; historical artifact retained	within synthetic review date	openCompatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.

Exact dependency paths and rationale · 40 witnesses

One stable witness per event, target and known/potential state. Both ANT → EDOC and PWR → EDOC survive deduplication of the affected set. Custody references are not causal edges.

ANT → EDOC · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain.
PWR → EDOC · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes.
PWR → EEMC · known path
DEP-PWR-EEMC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes.
ANT → EEXP · known path
DEP-ANT-EEXP: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain.
ANT → ERF · known path
DEP-ANT-ERF: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain.
ANT → EDOC → Q-CA-DOC → M-CA · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-CA-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-CA-DOC-M-CA: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
PWR → EDOC → Q-CA-DOC → M-CA · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-CA-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-CA-DOC-M-CA: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
ANT → EDOC → Q-CH-DOC → M-CH · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-CH-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-CH-DOC-M-CH: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
PWR → EDOC → Q-CH-DOC → M-CH · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-CH-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-CH-DOC-M-CH: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
ANT → EDOC → Q-EU-DOC → M-EU · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-EU-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-EU-DOC-M-EU: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
PWR → EDOC → Q-EU-DOC → M-EU · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-EU-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-EU-DOC-M-EU: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
ANT → EDOC → Q-GB-DOC → M-GB · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-GB-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-GB-DOC-M-GB: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
PWR → EDOC → Q-GB-DOC → M-GB · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-GB-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-GB-DOC-M-GB: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
ANT → EDOC → Q-US-DOC → M-US · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-US-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-US-DOC-M-US: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
PWR → EDOC → Q-US-DOC → M-US · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-US-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision. DEP-Q-US-DOC-M-US: Only this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.
ANT → EDOC → Q-CA-DOC · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-CA-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EDOC → Q-CA-DOC · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-CA-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EEMC → Q-CA-EMC · known path
DEP-PWR-EEMC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EEMC-Q-CA-EMC: The EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EEXP → Q-CA-EXP · known path
DEP-ANT-EEXP: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EEXP-Q-CA-EXP: The EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → ERF → Q-CA-RF · known path
DEP-ANT-ERF: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-ERF-Q-CA-RF: The RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EDOC → Q-CH-DOC · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-CH-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EDOC → Q-CH-DOC · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-CH-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EEMC → Q-CH-EMC · known path
DEP-PWR-EEMC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EEMC-Q-CH-EMC: The EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EEXP → Q-CH-EXP · known path
DEP-ANT-EEXP: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EEXP-Q-CH-EXP: The EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → ERF → Q-CH-RF · known path
DEP-ANT-ERF: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-ERF-Q-CH-RF: The RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EDOC → Q-EU-DOC · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-EU-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EDOC → Q-EU-DOC · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-EU-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EEMC → Q-EU-EMC · known path
DEP-PWR-EEMC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EEMC-Q-EU-EMC: The EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EEXP → Q-EU-EXP · known path
DEP-ANT-EEXP: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EEXP-Q-EU-EXP: The EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → ERF → Q-EU-RF · known path
DEP-ANT-ERF: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-ERF-Q-EU-RF: The RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EDOC → Q-GB-DOC · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-GB-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EDOC → Q-GB-DOC · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-GB-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EEMC → Q-GB-EMC · known path
DEP-PWR-EEMC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EEMC-Q-GB-EMC: The EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EEXP → Q-GB-EXP · known path
DEP-ANT-EEXP: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EEXP-Q-GB-EXP: The EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → ERF → Q-GB-RF · known path
DEP-ANT-ERF: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-ERF-Q-GB-RF: The RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EDOC → Q-US-DOC · known path
DEP-ANT-EDOC: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EDOC-Q-US-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EDOC → Q-US-DOC · known path
DEP-PWR-EDOC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EDOC-Q-US-DOC: The DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
PWR → EEMC → Q-US-EMC · known path
DEP-PWR-EEMC: Supply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes. DEP-EEMC-Q-US-EMC: The EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → EEXP → Q-US-EXP · known path
DEP-ANT-EEXP: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-EEXP-Q-US-EXP: The EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.
ANT → ERF → Q-US-RF · known path
DEP-ANT-ERF: Matching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain. DEP-ERF-Q-US-RF: The RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.

Unchanged within reviewed scope · 2 nodes

ESEC, Q-EU-ADD

SYN-COVERAGE-v1 covers only the eight supplied facts and the listed dependencies. The five v1 artifacts all remain immutable. A no-path result is not a claim about unmodeled components, national security duties or undisclosed radio modes.

Review packet scope and remaining decisions

No review packet selected. A filled row and an action owner do not close an engineering question.

20 question(s) remain open; an assigned action owner/date is not evidence of completion.

Restrictions and external decisions

Proposed engineering restriction: keep the changed manifest out of the release baseline until named jurisdiction actors resolve applicability, conformity route, marking, supply and operation. Owner: product compliance lead.

Engineering review, conformity-assessment review, actor release and authority action remain distinct. No actual authorization is produced.

Action sets · illustrative owners and planning dates
Event / actions	Evidence needed	Owner / due / state
ANTAnalyze mounted antenna and feed; Assess RF/exposure representative retest needs; Reconcile antenna and installation documents	Supplier construction/material/variation records; mounted comparison; exposure/installation rationale; exact permitted antenna and instruction scope.	Antenna / integration lead + exposure specialist2026-09-15 (synthetic planning target)Pending; owner and due date do not close it
PWRCompare emissions and loaded supply states; Assess representative EMC retest; Reconcile accessory and document scope	Supply schematic/switching/load comparison, cable routing and host traffic, report configuration, accessory list.	EMC lead + configuration owner2026-09-15 (synthetic planning target)Pending; owner and due date do not close it
All selected questionsObtain actual jurisdiction actor / conformity review; retain proposed configuration restriction	Exact product, activity, official sources, route, evidence, lab/body scope and responsible entity	Product compliance lead + named jurisdiction specialistsBefore any real release decision; no synthetic statutory deadlineActual applicability / release decisions remain external

Five preserved baseline evidence artifacts

SYN-ART-ERF-v1

Illustrative derived measurement record; SYN-METHOD-ERF-v1; SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1; SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01; date 2026-09-08. Internal exercise: on-time mean 19.3 dBm at R1-TX, real matched 50 Ω; 2.450 GHz generic QPSK; gate 2.0–23.6 ms within 25.6 ms burst; direct integrating power sensor, RBW/VBW/distance not applicable to this conducted exercise. U=0.4 dB, synthetic expanded uncertainty k=2; no statistical confidence claimed without distribution information. Internal inclusive interval-containment screen y+U≤19.7 dBm; not regulatory. ERF use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.

SYN-ART-EEMC-v1

Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied; SYN-METHOD-EEMC-v1; SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1; SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01; date 2026-09-08. No numerical test result. No technical value / decision interval supplied. Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail. EEMC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.

SYN-ART-EEXP-v1

Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied; SYN-METHOD-EEXP-v1; SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1; SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01; date 2026-09-08. No numerical test result. No technical value / decision interval supplied. Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail. EEXP use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.

SYN-ART-ESEC-v1

Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied; SYN-METHOD-ESEC-v1; SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1; SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01; date 2026-09-08. No numerical test result. No technical value / decision interval supplied. Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail. ESEC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.

SYN-ART-EDOC-v1

Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied; SYN-METHOD-EDOC-v1; SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1; SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01; date 2026-09-08. No numerical test result. No technical value / decision interval supplied. Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail. EDOC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.

Fixed eight-event boundary; 55 nodes / 59 edges. Maximum 64 nodes, 128 edges, 16 action records. Baseline p09-m06-baseline-v1; current event record p09-m06-change-events-v1. Supplied review premises cover p09-m06-change-events-v1 and manifest v2; different versions require reconciliation.

Go deeperComplete dependency and review-packet appendix

Complete causal edge list · fixed graph, v1
Edge ID / exact endpoints	Relation / rationale	Scope / reviewer
`DEP-ANT-ERF`ANT → ERF	component-use; knownMatching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ANT-EEXP`ANT → EEXP	component-use; knownMatching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ANT-EDOC`ANT → EDOC	component-use; knownMatching, efficiency, pattern and integration can change even at the same nominal gain.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-FW-ERF`FW → ERF	component-use; knownPower, scheduling and radio commands can alter RF, exposure, security controls and configuration documents.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-FW-EEXP`FW → EEXP	component-use; knownPower, scheduling and radio commands can alter RF, exposure, security controls and configuration documents.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-FW-ESEC`FW → ESEC	component-use; knownPower, scheduling and radio commands can alter RF, exposure, security controls and configuration documents.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-FW-EDOC`FW → EDOC	component-use; knownPower, scheduling and radio commands can alter RF, exposure, security controls and configuration documents.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-PWR-EEMC`PWR → EEMC	component-use; knownSupply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-PWR-EDOC`PWR → EDOC	component-use; knownSupply switching and cable common-mode current can change host emissions; supplied accessory identity changes.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ENC-ERF`ENC → ERF	component-use; knownA cosmetic label does not establish unchanged dielectric loss, conductivity or mounted antenna behavior.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ENC-EEXP`ENC → EEXP	component-use; knownA cosmetic label does not establish unchanged dielectric loss, conductivity or mounted antenna behavior.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-CLK-ERF`CLK → ERF	component-use; knownFrequency error, clock harmonics and mixing products connect radio performance and host emissions.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-CLK-EEMC`CLK → EEMC	component-use; knownFrequency error, clock harmonics and mixing products connect radio performance and host emissions.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-SEC-ESEC`SEC → ESEC	component-use; knownSecurity behavior changes; whether radio commands/timing also changed is a separate conditional question.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-SEC-ERF`SEC → ERF	component-use; unknownSecurity behavior changes; whether radio commands/timing also changed is a separate conditional question.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-SRC-EU-CITATION-Q-EU-RF`SRC-EU-CITATION → Q-EU-RF	source-question; knownCurrent source support for EU RF and selected additional questions changes; raw ERF/ESEC artifacts do not.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-SRC-EU-CITATION-Q-EU-ADD`SRC-EU-CITATION → Q-EU-ADD	source-question; knownCurrent source support for EU RF and selected additional questions changes; raw ERF/ESEC artifacts do not.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ERF-Q-EU-RF`ERF → Q-EU-RF	evidence-question; knownThe RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ERF-Q-CH-RF`ERF → Q-CH-RF	evidence-question; knownThe RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ERF-Q-GB-RF`ERF → Q-GB-RF	evidence-question; knownThe RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ERF-Q-US-RF`ERF → Q-US-RF	evidence-question; knownThe RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ERF-Q-CA-RF`ERF → Q-CA-RF	evidence-question; knownThe RF question uses this exact ERF evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEMC-Q-EU-EMC`EEMC → Q-EU-EMC	evidence-question; knownThe EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEMC-Q-CH-EMC`EEMC → Q-CH-EMC	evidence-question; knownThe EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEMC-Q-GB-EMC`EEMC → Q-GB-EMC	evidence-question; knownThe EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEMC-Q-US-EMC`EEMC → Q-US-EMC	evidence-question; knownThe EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEMC-Q-CA-EMC`EEMC → Q-CA-EMC	evidence-question; knownThe EMC question uses this exact EEMC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEXP-Q-EU-EXP`EEXP → Q-EU-EXP	evidence-question; knownThe EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEXP-Q-CH-EXP`EEXP → Q-CH-EXP	evidence-question; knownThe EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEXP-Q-GB-EXP`EEXP → Q-GB-EXP	evidence-question; knownThe EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEXP-Q-US-EXP`EEXP → Q-US-EXP	evidence-question; knownThe EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EEXP-Q-CA-EXP`EEXP → Q-CA-EXP	evidence-question; knownThe EXP question uses this exact EEXP evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-ESEC-Q-EU-ADD`ESEC → Q-EU-ADD	evidence-question; knownThe ADD question uses this exact ESEC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EDOC-Q-EU-DOC`EDOC → Q-EU-DOC	evidence-question; knownThe DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EDOC-Q-CH-DOC`EDOC → Q-CH-DOC	evidence-question; knownThe DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EDOC-Q-GB-DOC`EDOC → Q-GB-DOC	evidence-question; knownThe DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EDOC-Q-US-DOC`EDOC → Q-US-DOC	evidence-question; knownThe DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-EDOC-Q-CA-DOC`EDOC → Q-CA-DOC	evidence-question; knownThe DOC question uses this exact EDOC evidence scope; it does not inherit another market's decision.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-EU-RF-M-EU`Q-EU-RF → M-EU	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-CH-RF-M-CH`Q-CH-RF → M-CH	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-GB-RF-M-GB`Q-GB-RF → M-GB	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-US-RF-M-US`Q-US-RF → M-US	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-CA-RF-M-CA`Q-CA-RF → M-CA	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-EU-EMC-M-EU`Q-EU-EMC → M-EU	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-CH-EMC-M-CH`Q-CH-EMC → M-CH	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-GB-EMC-M-GB`Q-GB-EMC → M-GB	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-US-EMC-M-US`Q-US-EMC → M-US	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-CA-EMC-M-CA`Q-CA-EMC → M-CA	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-EU-EXP-M-EU`Q-EU-EXP → M-EU	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-CH-EXP-M-CH`Q-CH-EXP → M-CH	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-GB-EXP-M-GB`Q-GB-EXP → M-GB	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-US-EXP-M-US`Q-US-EXP → M-US	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-CA-EXP-M-CA`Q-CA-EXP → M-CA	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-EU-ADD-M-EU`Q-EU-ADD → M-EU	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-EU-DOC-M-EU`Q-EU-DOC → M-EU	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-CH-DOC-M-CH`Q-CH-DOC → M-CH	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-GB-DOC-M-GB`Q-GB-DOC → M-GB	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-US-DOC-M-US`Q-US-DOC → M-US	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1
`DEP-Q-CA-DOC-M-CA`Q-CA-DOC → M-CA	question-dossier; knownOnly this question’s own jurisdiction dossier depends on its review.	Only this declared G02-LC study and named question; no transfer outside SYN-COVERAGE-v1.Supplied fictional causal-review premise / curriculum author; v1

RP1 · complete supplied scope

id: RP1
events: [ "ANT", "PWR" ]
manifest: v2
eventVersion: p09-m06-change-events-v1
graphVersion: p09-m06-edges-v1
edgeIds: [ "DEP-ANT-ERF", "DEP-ANT-EEXP", "DEP-ANT-EDOC", "DEP-PWR-EEMC", "DEP-PWR-EDOC" ]
questions: [ "Q-EU-DOC", "Q-CH-DOC", "Q-GB-DOC", "Q-US-DOC", "Q-CA-DOC" ]
changedFacts: [ "ANT:v1→v2", "PWR:v1→v2" ]
evidenceRead: [ "SYN-DOC-RECONCILIATION-v2" ]
rationale: Only labels, instructions, accessory list and manifest reconciled. RF, EMC and exposure analysis missing.
reviewer: Fictional document/configuration reviewer
date: 2026-09-08
conditions: Exact ANT/PWR facts, v2 manifest, v1 events/edges, current source review, compatible scope. No manufacturing, supply, marking or operation authorization.
restrictions: []

RP2 · complete supplied scope

id: RP2
events: [ "ANT", "PWR" ]
manifest: v2
eventVersion: p09-m06-change-events-v1
graphVersion: p09-m06-edges-v1
edgeIds: [ "DEP-ANT-ERF", "DEP-ANT-EEXP", "DEP-ANT-EDOC", "DEP-PWR-EEMC", "DEP-PWR-EDOC" ]
questions: [ "Q-EU-RF" ]
changedFacts: [ "ANT:v1→v2", "PWR:v1→v2" ]
evidenceRead: [ "SYN-ANT-EU-RF-COMPARISON-v2" ]
rationale: A scoped antenna comparison supports Q-EU-RF only. Exposure remains unknown; no other RF question is closed.
reviewer: Fictional EU RF integration reviewer
date: 2026-09-08
conditions: Exact ANT/PWR facts, v2 manifest, v1 events/edges, current source review, compatible scope. No manufacturing, supply, marking or operation authorization.
restrictions: []

RP3 · complete supplied scope

id: RP3
events: [ "ANT", "PWR" ]
manifest: v2
eventVersion: p09-m06-change-events-v1
graphVersion: p09-m06-edges-v1
edgeIds: [ "DEP-ANT-ERF", "DEP-ANT-EEXP", "DEP-ANT-EDOC", "DEP-PWR-EEMC", "DEP-PWR-EDOC" ]
questions: [ "Q-EU-RF", "Q-CH-RF", "Q-GB-RF", "Q-US-RF", "Q-CA-RF", "Q-EU-EMC", "Q-CH-EMC", "Q-GB-EMC", "Q-US-EMC", "Q-CA-EMC", "Q-EU-EXP", "Q-CH-EXP", "Q-GB-EXP", "Q-US-EXP", "Q-CA-EXP", "Q-EU-DOC", "Q-CH-DOC", "Q-GB-DOC", "Q-US-DOC", "Q-CA-DOC" ]
changedFacts: [ "ANT:v1→v2", "PWR:v1→v2" ]
evidenceRead: [ "SYN-COMBINED-ANALYSIS-v2", "SYN-REPRESENTATIVE-RETEST-CONCLUSION-v2", "SYN-DOC-RECONCILIATION-v2" ]
rationale: Supplied synthetic reviewed premises support the twenty declared engineering questions for ANT+PWR. Analysis, representative retest conclusion and documents are traced; no new measured data are asserted.
reviewer: Fictional combined RF, EMC, exposure and documentation review panel
date: 2026-09-08
conditions: Exact ANT/PWR facts, v2 manifest, v1 events/edges, current source review, compatible scope. No manufacturing, supply, marking or operation authorization.
restrictions: []

SYN-DOC-RECONCILIATION-v2 · synthetic premise with parent evidence

id: SYN-DOC-RECONCILIATION-v2
parentIds: [ "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1" ]
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v2
date: 2026-09-08
origin: Synthetic reviewed premise, not measured evidence
conclusion: Only labels, instructions, accessory list and manifest reconciled. RF, EMC and exposure analysis missing.
reviewer: Fictional document/configuration reviewer
version: v2

SYN-ANT-EU-RF-COMPARISON-v2 · synthetic premise with parent evidence

id: SYN-ANT-EU-RF-COMPARISON-v2
parentIds: [ "SYN-ART-ERF-v1" ]
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v2
date: 2026-09-08
origin: Synthetic reviewed premise, not measured evidence
conclusion: A scoped antenna comparison supports Q-EU-RF only. Exposure remains unknown; no other RF question is closed.
reviewer: Fictional EU RF integration reviewer
version: v2

SYN-COMBINED-ANALYSIS-v2 · synthetic premise with parent evidence

id: SYN-COMBINED-ANALYSIS-v2
parentIds: [ "SYN-ART-ERF-v1", "SYN-ART-EEMC-v1", "SYN-ART-EEXP-v1", "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1" ]
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v2
date: 2026-09-08
origin: Synthetic reviewed premise, not measured evidence
conclusion: Supplied synthetic reviewed premises support the twenty declared engineering questions for ANT+PWR. Analysis, representative retest conclusion and documents are traced; no new measured data are asserted.
reviewer: Fictional combined RF, EMC, exposure and documentation review panel
version: v2

SYN-REPRESENTATIVE-RETEST-CONCLUSION-v2 · synthetic premise with parent evidence

id: SYN-REPRESENTATIVE-RETEST-CONCLUSION-v2
parentIds: [ "SYN-ART-ERF-v1", "SYN-ART-EEMC-v1", "SYN-ART-EEXP-v1", "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1" ]
manifest: SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v2
date: 2026-09-08
origin: Synthetic reviewed premise, not measured evidence
conclusion: Supplied synthetic reviewed premises support the twenty declared engineering questions for ANT+PWR. Analysis, representative retest conclusion and documents are traced; no new measured data are asserted.
reviewer: Fictional combined RF, EMC, exposure and documentation review panel
version: v2

Decision and record updateRecord the changed facts, manifest/edge/event versions, evidence read, reviewer role, date, rationale and conditions. Propose a revised baseline only as far as that record supports; keep retained restrictions and actual release questions visible.

Ungraded review

Check your understanding

Answer each question in your own words, then reveal the model answer.

01What makes test firmware representative of production?
Model answer
An exact image/configuration mapping, controlled channel/mode and power commands, documented scheduling/calibration differences, and evidence that the exercised state bounds the relevant production behavior. A convenient continuous carrier is not automatically representative of modulation, exposure or thermal behavior.
02Does a changed antenna invalidate the original report?
Model answer
Its historical observation and v1 configuration remain intact. Reusing it for v2 is a separate question. Keep the original artifact, create a new manifest and link any scoped analysis or new evidence to the prior record; do not edit its raw values or method identity.
03Why does ANT + PWR reach four evidence uses rather than five?
Model answer
ANT reaches ERF, EEXP and EDOC. PWR reaches EEMC and EDOC. Their union has four members because EDOC is shared, although both causal paths remain visible. Each reaches five market questions: twenty questions and five dossiers. There is no known ESEC path in this reviewed boundary.
04What changes in the source-only case?
Model answer
SRC-EU-CITATION reaches Q-EU-RF, Q-EU-ADD and M-EU directly. No raw report is changed, no evidence-use node is reached and no other market conclusion transfers. Check the exact activity/date, official citation restrictions and transition before deciding whether supplementary evidence or a route/document update is needed.
05How does an unknown SEC edge differ from reviewed no impact?
Model answer
Unknown SEC→ERF preserves potential radio questions and four additional potential dossiers; M-EU is already known through ESEC. A supplied scoped independence review removes only that conditional radio mechanism. ESEC and Q-EU-ADD stay known. Unreviewed WORDING or missing coverage cannot be cleared merely because no edge was found.
06Does a 0.4 dB old margin allow the firmware prediction to increase by 0.5 dB?
Model answer
No. The internal v1 interval is [18.9,19.7] dBm and meets the inclusive upper containment screen at equality. A hypothetical +0.5 dB gives [19.4,20.2] dBm only if the old U is provisionally reused. It straddles 19.7 dBm and is inconclusive under that screen; it is not a changed-firmware measurement or a legal pass/fail. New evidence and uncertainty review remain necessary.

Multi-market compliance strategy review

Ungraded Learn synthesis. Assemble a reviewable strategy from all six modules. No learner score, saved completion, approval or certificate is produced. A strong answer makes its evidence and open decisions easy to challenge.

Define the population before the change decision

Capstone applicability / configuration / mode / accessory matrix
Product / inherited tuple	Mode and representative question	Market / applicability
N01 A0/P0 · U1; N02 A1/P0 · U2	Generic node-TX; antenna/feed evidence determines any directional representative rationale.	Five original markets require their own rows; no blanket equivalence.
N03 A0/P0 · U3	Changed enclosure; mounted antenna and material variation remain explicit.	Actual method/applicability unresolved.
G01 A0/P1 · U4	USB host-active; clock, cable and traffic are EMC variables.	US parent is not a Canadian or European conclusion.
G02 A0/P2 · U5; A1/P2 · U6	Named Wi-Fi + generic node radio; concurrency and antenna/exposure restrictions need evidence.	GB EMC and CA exposure parents retain their original scope.
G03 A1/P2 · U7/U8	Cellular-option product in node-only state; added cellular mode not implied covered.	Swiss source and additional-applicability questions remain separate.
G02-LC v1 → v2	ANT+PWR study; retain hardware/images, 0.20 m feed and installation identity; compare new assemblies.	EU/CH/GB/US/CA review proposals; actual legal applicability unknown.

The four existing region images F-EU/F-CH/F-GB/F-NA remain identity fields, not promises of national suitability. The installation is an indoor fixed-bracket proposal with technician installer/general end user; actual separation, service mobility, operating temperature and other foreseeable use remain unresolved. Representative choices can differ by radio, EMC, exposure and document question.

Model answer · a defensible change-board brief

Authority and route: retain separate EU/CH/GB/US/CA records from 09.1, 09.3 and 09.4. Record actual actor/activity/date, national source and assessment/authorization questions. Government market access and any Bluetooth/Wi-Fi or other alliance qualification stay in separate lanes; no alliance record or qualification ID is supplied.
Sources and applicability: include the dated ledger below, exact locators/methods and each unresolved gap. A new citation needs its operative text. Earlier AU/BR/JP/KR and NI records remain historical context from 09.5; this board selects no additional expansion market and grants none new coverage.
Controlled evidence: index v1 artifacts, their specimen, method, result/uncertainty and scope. Keep the manifest, risk analysis, proposed declaration/label/instruction workflow and retention questions linked. Preserve all parent IDs listed in the register; new evidence and reviews get new versions.
Change trace: ANT→ERF/EEXP/EDOC and PWR→EEMC/EDOC yield 4/20/5 after deduplication. ESEC is unchanged only within the reviewed graph boundary. Keep both EDOC reasons. The old five artifacts remain immutable while their current uses require review.
Plan and restrictions: antenna/RF, EMC, exposure, firmware and document owners define the relevant analyses and representative tests. Source and actor reviewers resolve actual requirements. Keep v2 out of the actual release baseline until those decisions are made. Due dates coordinate review; they do not complete evidence or create legal deadlines.
Before / after evidence: RP1 leaves fifteen affected questions open; RP2 supports only Q-EU-RF. RP3 records twenty synthetic engineering reviews for the exact event/manifest/edge versions. Actual applicability and release remain outside that exercise. Any later version change requires reconciliation.

Dissenting alternative: retain the original antenna and supply for the current engineering plan, and review v2 separately. A cost advantage alone cannot reverse that position. A representative construction/integration comparison, source-scoped method evidence, reviewed uncertainty, reconciled documents and actual responsible-actor decisions could justify adopting v2. Evidence of altered pattern, supply interference, uncontrolled radio states or unresolved scope would instead strengthen the restriction or require revision.

Review emphasis: authority/source discipline 20%; configuration coverage 20%; route/evidence traceability 25%; change/version control 20%; escalation/legal boundary 15%. These proportions guide the explanation and discussion, not a learner grade.

Lifecycle register · complete static snapshot

p09-compliance-register-v1 / p09-m06-lifecycle-register-v1. Five own-row records link the earlier modules without requiring an earlier visit. Each row keeps actual source orientation separate from synthetic scenario dates and evidence; applicability and actual release remain open.

Register handoff · five independent lifecycle questions
Record / jurisdiction	Configuration / evidence	Owner / open decision
P09-M06-EU-v1EU: Germany study; other EEA incorporation not inferred	SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review	EU compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leadsCompare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
P09-M06-CH-v1CH	SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review	CH compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leadsCompare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
P09-M06-GB-v1GB	SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review	GB compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leadsCompare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
P09-M06-US-v1US	SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review	US compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leadsCompare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
P09-M06-CA-v1CA	SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review	CA compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leadsCompare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.

Complete typed row · P09-M06-EU-v1

id: P09-M06-EU-v1
schema: p09-compliance-register-v1
snapshot: p09-m06-lifecycle-register-v1
parentIds: [ "teaching-node-v1", "NEED-08", "C-MARKET", "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A", "P09-M01-C09-v1", "P09-M01-C10-v1", "P09-M02-U1-v1", "P09-M02-U2-v1", "P09-M02-U3-v1", "P09-M02-U4-v1", "P09-M02-U5-v1", "P09-M02-U6-v1", "P09-M02-U7-v1", "P09-M02-U8-v1", "P09-M03-EU-DE-v1", "P09-M03-CH-v1", "P09-M03-GB-v1", "P09-M03-NI-v1", "P09-M04-US-v1", "P09-M04-CA-v1", "P09-M05-AU-v1", "P09-M05-BR-v1", "P09-M05-JP-v1", "P09-M05-KR-v1" ]
owningModule: 09.6
question: Which controlled baseline and evidence justify the proposed ANT/PWR change, and which actual jurisdiction decisions remain open?
claimType: Illustrative engineering review question with separate actual-source orientation
jurisdiction: EU
territory: EU: Germany study; other EEA incorporation not inferred
intendedActivity: Proposed manufacture / supply / placing on market / operation, each requiring its own actual date and route
activityDate: Unknown / not supplied
configuration: { "id": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "parentId": "SYN-MAN-G02-A1-P2-F-NA-wifi-node-v1", "scenario": "teaching-node-v1", "sku": "G02", "hardware": "SYN-HW-G02-v1", "firmware": "SYN-FW-G02-F-NA-v1", "region": "F-NA", "radios": "Node: generic 2.450 GHz QPSK; 20 kbit/s information, 10 ksymbol/s, RRC α=0.35, 80 ksample/s D3; no standardized mode inferred. Named Wi-Fi option: exact standard, band/channel, power, bandwidth and duty unknown.", "mode": "wifi-node", "concurrent": true, "antenna": "A1", "antennaVersion": "SYN-A1-v1", "cable": "External coax SYN-COAX-v1, 0.20 m; pattern/gain/loss evidence unknown", "enclosure": "SYN-ENC-G02-v1", "supply": "P2", "supplyVersion": "SYN-P2-v1", "installation": "SYN-INSTALL-v1: indoor fixed bracket proposed; separation, mobility during service and outdoor use unresolved", "user": "SYN-USER-v1: technician installer and general end user proposed; access/service conditions unresolved", "environment": "25 °C bench identity only; operational temperature, humidity and foreseeable environment unresolved", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "regionControl": "SYN-REGION-v1: four build images exist; signed configuration, recovery and forbidden-state reachability evidence unknown", "testImageRelation": "SYN-TEST-v1 mapped to production image ID; radio-state equivalence and command limits need reviewer evidence", "study": "G02-LC: five-market lifecycle comparison, derived from G02; no regional suitability asserted", "clock": "SYN-CLK-v1", "security": "SYN-SEC-v1", "sourceVersion": "SYN-EU-CITATION-v1", "internalNote": "SYN-INTERNAL-NOTE-v1" }
families: [ "radio", "EMC", "exposure", "documents", "selected additional security question" ]
applicability: { "state": "unknown", "rationale": "Final product category, use, mode, activity and applicable requirements not established by synthetic graph reachability.", "reviewer": "Actual jurisdiction specialist unassigned; no legal attestation" }
authority: [ { "id": "RED", "issuer": "European Parliament / Council", "title": "Radio Equipment Directive 2014/53/EU", "role": "Legislation; consolidation is a documentation aid", "version": "Consolidation 2026-05-30; current-version link checked", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/53/2026-05-30/eng", "locator": "Articles 10(4–5,11–12), 21(1–4)", "language": "English", "claim": "Manufacturers account for design and referenced-specification changes; documentation is maintained and risk/nonconformity has actor-specific follow-up.", "limitation": "No actual product, national implementation, applicable method or release route selected.", "publication": "2014-05-22", "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "status": "Relevant text read" }, { "id": "EU-INDEX", "issuer": "European Commission", "title": "Radio equipment — harmonised standards publications", "role": "Official discovery index; summary has no legal effect", "version": "Live index lists amendment of 4 September 2026 / 2026/2003", "url": "https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/goods/european-standards/harmonised-standards/radio-equipment_en", "locator": "Publications in the Official Journal; summary status paragraph", "language": "English", "claim": "Official citation updates must be checked independently of an existing measurement or a standards PDF.", "limitation": "The linked 2026/2003 act redirected to an OJ landing page during this reading; operative annex and transition not reverified. No changed product requirement inferred.", "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "status": "Index read; linked new act unresolved" } ]
evidence: [ { "id": "SYN-ART-ERF-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ERF", "parentIds": [ "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A" ], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ERF-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ERF-v1", "kind": "Illustrative derived measurement record", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "Internal exercise: on-time mean 19.3 dBm at R1-TX, real matched 50 Ω; 2.450 GHz generic QPSK; gate 2.0–23.6 ms within 25.6 ms burst; direct integrating power sensor, RBW/VBW/distance not applicable to this conducted exercise", "uncertainty": "U=0.4 dB, synthetic expanded uncertainty k=2; no statistical confidence claimed without distribution information", "decisionRule": "Internal inclusive interval-containment screen y+U≤19.7 dBm; not regulatory", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ERF use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEMC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEMC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEMC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEMC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEMC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEXP-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEXP", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEXP-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEXP-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEXP use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-ESEC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ESEC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ESEC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ESEC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ESEC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EDOC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EDOC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EDOC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EDOC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" } ]
scopeMatch: Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review
evidenceMaturity: Illustrative historical metadata; supplied premises are synthetic, no actual report or grant
sourceReview: Actual locators read with source-specific gaps retained. Synthetic current/due state is independent.
legalValidity: Not evaluated; no product approval or market-access conclusion
actor: Manufacturer / applicable importer and authorised representative; entity and activity unassigned
responsibility: Identify exact actor, conformity/authorization route, document/label/instruction duties and retention trigger. Engineer supplies evidence; actor release remains separate.
unresolved: [ "Q-EU-DOC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-EU-EMC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-EU-EXP: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-EU-RF: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Actual legal applicability and actor release", "Representative samples, methods and lab/body scope", "Final user instructions, labels and retention conditions", "Expansion parents and NI remain historical context; no new coverage asserted" ]
nextAction: Compare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
owner: EU compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leads
dependencies: [ "DEP-Q-EU-RF-M-EU", "DEP-Q-EU-EMC-M-EU", "DEP-Q-EU-EXP-M-EU", "DEP-Q-EU-ADD-M-EU", "DEP-Q-EU-DOC-M-EU" ]
dates: { "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "actualAccess": "2026-09-10", "actualReview": "2026-09-10", "reviewDue": "2026-12-09", "actualEvaluation": "2026-09-10", "syntheticEvaluation": "2026-09-08", "syntheticReviewDue": "2026-12-07" }
questions: [ "Q-EU-RF", "Q-EU-EMC", "Q-EU-EXP", "Q-EU-ADD", "Q-EU-DOC" ]

Complete typed row · P09-M06-CH-v1

id: P09-M06-CH-v1
schema: p09-compliance-register-v1
snapshot: p09-m06-lifecycle-register-v1
parentIds: [ "teaching-node-v1", "NEED-08", "C-MARKET", "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A", "P09-M01-C09-v1", "P09-M01-C10-v1", "P09-M02-U1-v1", "P09-M02-U2-v1", "P09-M02-U3-v1", "P09-M02-U4-v1", "P09-M02-U5-v1", "P09-M02-U6-v1", "P09-M02-U7-v1", "P09-M02-U8-v1", "P09-M03-EU-DE-v1", "P09-M03-CH-v1", "P09-M03-GB-v1", "P09-M03-NI-v1", "P09-M04-US-v1", "P09-M04-CA-v1", "P09-M05-AU-v1", "P09-M05-BR-v1", "P09-M05-JP-v1", "P09-M05-KR-v1" ]
owningModule: 09.6
question: Which controlled baseline and evidence justify the proposed ANT/PWR change, and which actual jurisdiction decisions remain open?
claimType: Illustrative engineering review question with separate actual-source orientation
jurisdiction: CH
territory: CH
intendedActivity: Proposed manufacture / supply / placing on market / operation, each requiring its own actual date and route
activityDate: Unknown / not supplied
configuration: { "id": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "parentId": "SYN-MAN-G02-A1-P2-F-NA-wifi-node-v1", "scenario": "teaching-node-v1", "sku": "G02", "hardware": "SYN-HW-G02-v1", "firmware": "SYN-FW-G02-F-NA-v1", "region": "F-NA", "radios": "Node: generic 2.450 GHz QPSK; 20 kbit/s information, 10 ksymbol/s, RRC α=0.35, 80 ksample/s D3; no standardized mode inferred. Named Wi-Fi option: exact standard, band/channel, power, bandwidth and duty unknown.", "mode": "wifi-node", "concurrent": true, "antenna": "A1", "antennaVersion": "SYN-A1-v1", "cable": "External coax SYN-COAX-v1, 0.20 m; pattern/gain/loss evidence unknown", "enclosure": "SYN-ENC-G02-v1", "supply": "P2", "supplyVersion": "SYN-P2-v1", "installation": "SYN-INSTALL-v1: indoor fixed bracket proposed; separation, mobility during service and outdoor use unresolved", "user": "SYN-USER-v1: technician installer and general end user proposed; access/service conditions unresolved", "environment": "25 °C bench identity only; operational temperature, humidity and foreseeable environment unresolved", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "regionControl": "SYN-REGION-v1: four build images exist; signed configuration, recovery and forbidden-state reachability evidence unknown", "testImageRelation": "SYN-TEST-v1 mapped to production image ID; radio-state equivalence and command limits need reviewer evidence", "study": "G02-LC: five-market lifecycle comparison, derived from G02; no regional suitability asserted", "clock": "SYN-CLK-v1", "security": "SYN-SEC-v1", "sourceVersion": "SYN-EU-CITATION-v1", "internalNote": "SYN-INTERNAL-NOTE-v1" }
families: [ "radio", "EMC", "exposure", "documents; security outside this tiny fixture, not inapplicable" ]
applicability: { "state": "unknown", "rationale": "Final product category, use, mode, activity and applicable requirements not established by synthetic graph reachability.", "reviewer": "Actual jurisdiction specialist unassigned; no legal attestation" }
authority: [ { "id": "CH-LAW", "issuer": "Swiss Federal Council / Fedlex", "title": "Ordinance on Telecommunications Installations, SR 784.101.2", "role": "Swiss ordinance (OIT/TIO)", "version": "State 15 August 2024; future 1 July 2028 version separately listed", "url": "https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2016/24/fr", "locator": "Articles 14,16,23–24,36–38; Annex 3 II 2.2", "language": "French; English educational paraphrase", "claim": "Documentation, change controls and actor follow-up are linked but distinct. Swiss retention anchors and series conditions need their own record.", "limitation": "No Swiss category, designated method or national operating permission selected. English paraphrase is not a certified translation.", "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": "2016-06-13", "application": null, "transition": null, "status": "Actual current-state text read in browser" }, { "id": "OFCOM", "issuer": "Swiss OFCOM", "title": "Technical documentation", "role": "Regulator guidance", "version": "Published 16 April 2019", "url": "https://www.bakom.admin.ch/en/technical-documentation", "locator": "Document scope and contents", "language": "English", "claim": "Documentation connects design, production and operation to the conformity question.", "limitation": "Telecommunications guidance does not cover every other applicable product law.", "publication": "2019-04-16", "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "status": "Text read" } ]
evidence: [ { "id": "SYN-ART-ERF-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ERF", "parentIds": [ "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A" ], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ERF-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ERF-v1", "kind": "Illustrative derived measurement record", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "Internal exercise: on-time mean 19.3 dBm at R1-TX, real matched 50 Ω; 2.450 GHz generic QPSK; gate 2.0–23.6 ms within 25.6 ms burst; direct integrating power sensor, RBW/VBW/distance not applicable to this conducted exercise", "uncertainty": "U=0.4 dB, synthetic expanded uncertainty k=2; no statistical confidence claimed without distribution information", "decisionRule": "Internal inclusive interval-containment screen y+U≤19.7 dBm; not regulatory", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ERF use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEMC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEMC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEMC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEMC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEMC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEXP-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEXP", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEXP-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEXP-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEXP use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-ESEC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ESEC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ESEC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ESEC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ESEC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EDOC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EDOC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EDOC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EDOC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" } ]
scopeMatch: Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review
evidenceMaturity: Illustrative historical metadata; supplied premises are synthetic, no actual report or grant
sourceReview: Actual locators read with source-specific gaps retained. Synthetic current/due state is independent.
legalValidity: Not evaluated; no product approval or market-access conclusion
actor: Manufacturer / authorised representative / importer, with Swiss role conditions to establish
responsibility: Identify exact actor, conformity/authorization route, document/label/instruction duties and retention trigger. Engineer supplies evidence; actor release remains separate.
unresolved: [ "Q-CH-DOC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-CH-EMC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-CH-EXP: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-CH-RF: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Actual legal applicability and actor release", "Representative samples, methods and lab/body scope", "Final user instructions, labels and retention conditions", "Expansion parents and NI remain historical context; no new coverage asserted" ]
nextAction: Compare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
owner: CH compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leads
dependencies: [ "DEP-Q-CH-RF-M-CH", "DEP-Q-CH-EMC-M-CH", "DEP-Q-CH-EXP-M-CH", "DEP-Q-CH-DOC-M-CH" ]
dates: { "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "actualAccess": "2026-09-10", "actualReview": "2026-09-10", "reviewDue": "2026-12-09", "actualEvaluation": "2026-09-10", "syntheticEvaluation": "2026-09-08", "syntheticReviewDue": "2026-12-07" }
questions: [ "Q-CH-RF", "Q-CH-EMC", "Q-CH-EXP", "Q-CH-DOC" ]

Complete typed row · P09-M06-GB-v1

id: P09-M06-GB-v1
schema: p09-compliance-register-v1
snapshot: p09-m06-lifecycle-register-v1
parentIds: [ "teaching-node-v1", "NEED-08", "C-MARKET", "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A", "P09-M01-C09-v1", "P09-M01-C10-v1", "P09-M02-U1-v1", "P09-M02-U2-v1", "P09-M02-U3-v1", "P09-M02-U4-v1", "P09-M02-U5-v1", "P09-M02-U6-v1", "P09-M02-U7-v1", "P09-M02-U8-v1", "P09-M03-EU-DE-v1", "P09-M03-CH-v1", "P09-M03-GB-v1", "P09-M03-NI-v1", "P09-M04-US-v1", "P09-M04-CA-v1", "P09-M05-AU-v1", "P09-M05-BR-v1", "P09-M05-JP-v1", "P09-M05-KR-v1" ]
owningModule: 09.6
question: Which controlled baseline and evidence justify the proposed ANT/PWR change, and which actual jurisdiction decisions remain open?
claimType: Illustrative engineering review question with separate actual-source orientation
jurisdiction: GB
territory: GB
intendedActivity: Proposed manufacture / supply / placing on market / operation, each requiring its own actual date and route
activityDate: Unknown / not supplied
configuration: { "id": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "parentId": "SYN-MAN-G02-A1-P2-F-NA-wifi-node-v1", "scenario": "teaching-node-v1", "sku": "G02", "hardware": "SYN-HW-G02-v1", "firmware": "SYN-FW-G02-F-NA-v1", "region": "F-NA", "radios": "Node: generic 2.450 GHz QPSK; 20 kbit/s information, 10 ksymbol/s, RRC α=0.35, 80 ksample/s D3; no standardized mode inferred. Named Wi-Fi option: exact standard, band/channel, power, bandwidth and duty unknown.", "mode": "wifi-node", "concurrent": true, "antenna": "A1", "antennaVersion": "SYN-A1-v1", "cable": "External coax SYN-COAX-v1, 0.20 m; pattern/gain/loss evidence unknown", "enclosure": "SYN-ENC-G02-v1", "supply": "P2", "supplyVersion": "SYN-P2-v1", "installation": "SYN-INSTALL-v1: indoor fixed bracket proposed; separation, mobility during service and outdoor use unresolved", "user": "SYN-USER-v1: technician installer and general end user proposed; access/service conditions unresolved", "environment": "25 °C bench identity only; operational temperature, humidity and foreseeable environment unresolved", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "regionControl": "SYN-REGION-v1: four build images exist; signed configuration, recovery and forbidden-state reachability evidence unknown", "testImageRelation": "SYN-TEST-v1 mapped to production image ID; radio-state equivalence and command limits need reviewer evidence", "study": "G02-LC: five-market lifecycle comparison, derived from G02; no regional suitability asserted", "clock": "SYN-CLK-v1", "security": "SYN-SEC-v1", "sourceVersion": "SYN-EU-CITATION-v1", "internalNote": "SYN-INTERNAL-NOTE-v1" }
families: [ "radio", "EMC", "exposure", "documents; security outside this tiny fixture, not inapplicable" ]
applicability: { "state": "unknown", "rationale": "Final product category, use, mode, activity and applicable requirements not established by synthetic graph reachability.", "reviewer": "Actual jurisdiction specialist unassigned; no legal attestation" }
authority: [ { "id": "GB", "issuer": "UK OPSS", "title": "Radio Equipment Regulations 2017: Great Britain", "role": "Official guidance about legislation", "version": "March 2025 guidance; collection updated 16 December 2025", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/radio-equipment-regulations-2017/radio-equipment-regulations-2017-great-britain", "locator": "Section 4 items 1–9, manufacturer documentation, production and follow-up", "language": "English", "claim": "The manufacturer’s production, documentation and follow-up responsibilities need their own GB record.", "limitation": "Direct regulation 17 retrieval was blocked; legislative annotations not reverified. NI and actual marking eligibility remain separate.", "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "status": "Guidance read; direct legislative recheck open" } ]
evidence: [ { "id": "SYN-ART-ERF-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ERF", "parentIds": [ "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A" ], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ERF-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ERF-v1", "kind": "Illustrative derived measurement record", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "Internal exercise: on-time mean 19.3 dBm at R1-TX, real matched 50 Ω; 2.450 GHz generic QPSK; gate 2.0–23.6 ms within 25.6 ms burst; direct integrating power sensor, RBW/VBW/distance not applicable to this conducted exercise", "uncertainty": "U=0.4 dB, synthetic expanded uncertainty k=2; no statistical confidence claimed without distribution information", "decisionRule": "Internal inclusive interval-containment screen y+U≤19.7 dBm; not regulatory", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ERF use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEMC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEMC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEMC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEMC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEMC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEXP-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEXP", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEXP-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEXP-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEXP use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-ESEC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ESEC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ESEC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ESEC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ESEC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EDOC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EDOC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EDOC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EDOC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" } ]
scopeMatch: Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review
evidenceMaturity: Illustrative historical metadata; supplied premises are synthetic, no actual report or grant
sourceReview: Actual locators read with source-specific gaps retained. Synthetic current/due state is independent.
legalValidity: Not evaluated; no product approval or market-access conclusion
actor: Manufacturer / importer and mandated representative under the GB route; entity unassigned
responsibility: Identify exact actor, conformity/authorization route, document/label/instruction duties and retention trigger. Engineer supplies evidence; actor release remains separate.
unresolved: [ "Q-GB-DOC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-GB-EMC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-GB-EXP: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-GB-RF: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Actual legal applicability and actor release", "Representative samples, methods and lab/body scope", "Final user instructions, labels and retention conditions", "Expansion parents and NI remain historical context; no new coverage asserted" ]
nextAction: Compare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
owner: GB compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leads
dependencies: [ "DEP-Q-GB-RF-M-GB", "DEP-Q-GB-EMC-M-GB", "DEP-Q-GB-EXP-M-GB", "DEP-Q-GB-DOC-M-GB" ]
dates: { "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "actualAccess": "2026-09-10", "actualReview": "2026-09-10", "reviewDue": "2026-12-09", "actualEvaluation": "2026-09-10", "syntheticEvaluation": "2026-09-08", "syntheticReviewDue": "2026-12-07" }
questions: [ "Q-GB-RF", "Q-GB-EMC", "Q-GB-EXP", "Q-GB-DOC" ]

Complete typed row · P09-M06-US-v1

id: P09-M06-US-v1
schema: p09-compliance-register-v1
snapshot: p09-m06-lifecycle-register-v1
parentIds: [ "teaching-node-v1", "NEED-08", "C-MARKET", "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A", "P09-M01-C09-v1", "P09-M01-C10-v1", "P09-M02-U1-v1", "P09-M02-U2-v1", "P09-M02-U3-v1", "P09-M02-U4-v1", "P09-M02-U5-v1", "P09-M02-U6-v1", "P09-M02-U7-v1", "P09-M02-U8-v1", "P09-M03-EU-DE-v1", "P09-M03-CH-v1", "P09-M03-GB-v1", "P09-M03-NI-v1", "P09-M04-US-v1", "P09-M04-CA-v1", "P09-M05-AU-v1", "P09-M05-BR-v1", "P09-M05-JP-v1", "P09-M05-KR-v1" ]
owningModule: 09.6
question: Which controlled baseline and evidence justify the proposed ANT/PWR change, and which actual jurisdiction decisions remain open?
claimType: Illustrative engineering review question with separate actual-source orientation
jurisdiction: US
territory: US
intendedActivity: Proposed manufacture / supply / placing on market / operation, each requiring its own actual date and route
activityDate: Unknown / not supplied
configuration: { "id": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "parentId": "SYN-MAN-G02-A1-P2-F-NA-wifi-node-v1", "scenario": "teaching-node-v1", "sku": "G02", "hardware": "SYN-HW-G02-v1", "firmware": "SYN-FW-G02-F-NA-v1", "region": "F-NA", "radios": "Node: generic 2.450 GHz QPSK; 20 kbit/s information, 10 ksymbol/s, RRC α=0.35, 80 ksample/s D3; no standardized mode inferred. Named Wi-Fi option: exact standard, band/channel, power, bandwidth and duty unknown.", "mode": "wifi-node", "concurrent": true, "antenna": "A1", "antennaVersion": "SYN-A1-v1", "cable": "External coax SYN-COAX-v1, 0.20 m; pattern/gain/loss evidence unknown", "enclosure": "SYN-ENC-G02-v1", "supply": "P2", "supplyVersion": "SYN-P2-v1", "installation": "SYN-INSTALL-v1: indoor fixed bracket proposed; separation, mobility during service and outdoor use unresolved", "user": "SYN-USER-v1: technician installer and general end user proposed; access/service conditions unresolved", "environment": "25 °C bench identity only; operational temperature, humidity and foreseeable environment unresolved", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "regionControl": "SYN-REGION-v1: four build images exist; signed configuration, recovery and forbidden-state reachability evidence unknown", "testImageRelation": "SYN-TEST-v1 mapped to production image ID; radio-state equivalence and command limits need reviewer evidence", "study": "G02-LC: five-market lifecycle comparison, derived from G02; no regional suitability asserted", "clock": "SYN-CLK-v1", "security": "SYN-SEC-v1", "sourceVersion": "SYN-EU-CITATION-v1", "internalNote": "SYN-INTERNAL-NOTE-v1" }
families: [ "radio", "EMC", "exposure", "documents; security outside this tiny fixture, not inapplicable" ]
applicability: { "state": "unknown", "rationale": "Final product category, use, mode, activity and applicable requirements not established by synthetic graph reachability.", "reviewer": "Actual jurisdiction specialist unassigned; no legal attestation" }
authority: [ { "id": "FCC", "issuer": "FCC / eCFR", "title": "47 CFR Part 2 Subpart J", "role": "Federal rules in authoritative but unofficial eCFR compilation", "version": "Current endpoint accessed 2026-09-10; cross-reference amendment notices retained", "url": "https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-2/subpart-J", "locator": "Sections 2.937, 2.938(a–b), 2.1043(a–b)", "language": "English", "claim": "Design/change records and technical change conditions matter. A software label alone cannot establish that RF emissions are unaffected.", "limitation": "Amendment cross-references not independently resolved; no permissive-change class, filing route or grant decision assigned.", "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "status": "Displayed provisions read; amendment applicability open" } ]
evidence: [ { "id": "SYN-ART-ERF-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ERF", "parentIds": [ "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A" ], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ERF-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ERF-v1", "kind": "Illustrative derived measurement record", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "Internal exercise: on-time mean 19.3 dBm at R1-TX, real matched 50 Ω; 2.450 GHz generic QPSK; gate 2.0–23.6 ms within 25.6 ms burst; direct integrating power sensor, RBW/VBW/distance not applicable to this conducted exercise", "uncertainty": "U=0.4 dB, synthetic expanded uncertainty k=2; no statistical confidence claimed without distribution information", "decisionRule": "Internal inclusive interval-containment screen y+U≤19.7 dBm; not regulatory", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ERF use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEMC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEMC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEMC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEMC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEMC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEXP-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEXP", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEXP-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEXP-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEXP use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-ESEC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ESEC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ESEC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ESEC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ESEC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EDOC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EDOC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EDOC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EDOC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" } ]
scopeMatch: Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review
evidenceMaturity: Illustrative historical metadata; supplied premises are synthetic, no actual report or grant
sourceReview: Actual locators read with source-specific gaps retained. Synthetic current/due state is independent.
legalValidity: Not evaluated; no product approval or market-access conclusion
actor: Responsible party / grantee for the actual authorization; TCB and legal scope unresolved
responsibility: Identify exact actor, conformity/authorization route, document/label/instruction duties and retention trigger. Engineer supplies evidence; actor release remains separate.
unresolved: [ "Q-US-DOC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-US-EMC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-US-EXP: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-US-RF: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Actual legal applicability and actor release", "Representative samples, methods and lab/body scope", "Final user instructions, labels and retention conditions", "Expansion parents and NI remain historical context; no new coverage asserted" ]
nextAction: Compare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
owner: US compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leads
dependencies: [ "DEP-Q-US-RF-M-US", "DEP-Q-US-EMC-M-US", "DEP-Q-US-EXP-M-US", "DEP-Q-US-DOC-M-US" ]
dates: { "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "actualAccess": "2026-09-10", "actualReview": "2026-09-10", "reviewDue": "2026-12-09", "actualEvaluation": "2026-09-10", "syntheticEvaluation": "2026-09-08", "syntheticReviewDue": "2026-12-07" }
questions: [ "Q-US-RF", "Q-US-EMC", "Q-US-EXP", "Q-US-DOC" ]

Complete typed row · P09-M06-CA-v1

id: P09-M06-CA-v1
schema: p09-compliance-register-v1
snapshot: p09-m06-lifecycle-register-v1
parentIds: [ "teaching-node-v1", "NEED-08", "C-MARKET", "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A", "P09-M01-C09-v1", "P09-M01-C10-v1", "P09-M02-U1-v1", "P09-M02-U2-v1", "P09-M02-U3-v1", "P09-M02-U4-v1", "P09-M02-U5-v1", "P09-M02-U6-v1", "P09-M02-U7-v1", "P09-M02-U8-v1", "P09-M03-EU-DE-v1", "P09-M03-CH-v1", "P09-M03-GB-v1", "P09-M03-NI-v1", "P09-M04-US-v1", "P09-M04-CA-v1", "P09-M05-AU-v1", "P09-M05-BR-v1", "P09-M05-JP-v1", "P09-M05-KR-v1" ]
owningModule: 09.6
question: Which controlled baseline and evidence justify the proposed ANT/PWR change, and which actual jurisdiction decisions remain open?
claimType: Illustrative engineering review question with separate actual-source orientation
jurisdiction: CA
territory: CA
intendedActivity: Proposed manufacture / supply / placing on market / operation, each requiring its own actual date and route
activityDate: Unknown / not supplied
configuration: { "id": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "parentId": "SYN-MAN-G02-A1-P2-F-NA-wifi-node-v1", "scenario": "teaching-node-v1", "sku": "G02", "hardware": "SYN-HW-G02-v1", "firmware": "SYN-FW-G02-F-NA-v1", "region": "F-NA", "radios": "Node: generic 2.450 GHz QPSK; 20 kbit/s information, 10 ksymbol/s, RRC α=0.35, 80 ksample/s D3; no standardized mode inferred. Named Wi-Fi option: exact standard, band/channel, power, bandwidth and duty unknown.", "mode": "wifi-node", "concurrent": true, "antenna": "A1", "antennaVersion": "SYN-A1-v1", "cable": "External coax SYN-COAX-v1, 0.20 m; pattern/gain/loss evidence unknown", "enclosure": "SYN-ENC-G02-v1", "supply": "P2", "supplyVersion": "SYN-P2-v1", "installation": "SYN-INSTALL-v1: indoor fixed bracket proposed; separation, mobility during service and outdoor use unresolved", "user": "SYN-USER-v1: technician installer and general end user proposed; access/service conditions unresolved", "environment": "25 °C bench identity only; operational temperature, humidity and foreseeable environment unresolved", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "regionControl": "SYN-REGION-v1: four build images exist; signed configuration, recovery and forbidden-state reachability evidence unknown", "testImageRelation": "SYN-TEST-v1 mapped to production image ID; radio-state equivalence and command limits need reviewer evidence", "study": "G02-LC: five-market lifecycle comparison, derived from G02; no regional suitability asserted", "clock": "SYN-CLK-v1", "security": "SYN-SEC-v1", "sourceVersion": "SYN-EU-CITATION-v1", "internalNote": "SYN-INTERNAL-NOTE-v1" }
families: [ "radio", "EMC", "exposure", "documents; security outside this tiny fixture, not inapplicable" ]
applicability: { "state": "unknown", "rationale": "Final product category, use, mode, activity and applicable requirements not established by synthetic graph reachability.", "reviewer": "Actual jurisdiction specialist unassigned; no legal attestation" }
authority: [ { "id": "RSP", "issuer": "ISED", "title": "RSP-100 — Certification of Radio Apparatus and Broadcasting Equipment", "role": "Official certification procedure", "version": "Issue 12, August 2019", "url": "https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spectrum-management-telecommunications/en/devices-and-equipment/radio-standards-procedures-rsp/rsp-100-certification-radio-apparatus-and-broadcasting-equipment", "locator": "Sections 10, 10.1–10.2, 11.2–11.4", "language": "English", "claim": "Change review uses Canadian product/firmware/host identity and its applicable procedure; a foreign change disposition is not a Canadian conclusion.", "limitation": "Certificate holder, actual modified product, category and CB review are unresolved.", "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "status": "Relevant text read" }, { "id": "RSS", "issuer": "ISED", "title": "RSS-Gen — General Requirements for Compliance of Radio Apparatus", "role": "Official technical specification", "version": "Issue 6, 30 July 2026, confirmed in live browser", "url": "https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spectrum-management-telecommunications/en/devices-and-equipment/radio-equipment-standards/radio-standards-specifications-rss/rss-gen-general-requirements-compliance-radio-apparatus", "locator": "Sections 3.1, 4.2, 4.5, 8.1–8.2; report/sample identity and modification paragraphs", "language": "English", "claim": "Report identity, actual specimen configuration and continuing records remain material after certification or modification.", "limitation": "Band-specific RSS, transitions for a real activity, lab scope and actual Canadian route remain open.", "publication": "2026-07-30", "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "status": "Issue and relevant text read in browser" } ]
evidence: [ { "id": "SYN-ART-ERF-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ERF", "parentIds": [ "M08-01-RAW-A", "M08-01-DERIVED-A" ], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ERF-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ERF-v1", "kind": "Illustrative derived measurement record", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "Internal exercise: on-time mean 19.3 dBm at R1-TX, real matched 50 Ω; 2.450 GHz generic QPSK; gate 2.0–23.6 ms within 25.6 ms burst; direct integrating power sensor, RBW/VBW/distance not applicable to this conducted exercise", "uncertainty": "U=0.4 dB, synthetic expanded uncertainty k=2; no statistical confidence claimed without distribution information", "decisionRule": "Internal inclusive interval-containment screen y+U≤19.7 dBm; not regulatory", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ERF use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEMC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEMC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEMC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEMC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEMC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EEXP-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EEXP", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EEXP-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EEXP-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EEXP use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-ESEC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "ESEC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-ESEC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-ESEC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "ESEC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" }, { "id": "SYN-ART-EDOC-v1", "version": "v1", "use": "EDOC", "parentIds": [], "identity": "Stable synthetic ID/version, not a hash of a real file", "manifest": "SYN-MAN-G02-LC-v1", "sample": "SYN-SAMPLE-G02-01", "method": "SYN-METHOD-EDOC-v1", "source": "SYN-REQUIREMENT-EDOC-v1", "kind": "Synthetic documentary artifact; no measured values supplied", "rawOrDerived": "Derived / synthetic; raw acquisition custody is a separate record", "date": "2026-09-08", "result": "No numerical test result", "uncertainty": "No technical value / decision interval supplied", "decisionRule": "Review documentary scope; no measurement pass/fail", "reviewer": "Supplied fictional baseline record", "scope": "EDOC use only under v1. Does not establish actual legal applicability.", "currentUse": "Evaluated separately; historical record never overwritten" } ]
scopeMatch: Old artifact belongs to v1; ANT/PWR current use pending scoped review
evidenceMaturity: Illustrative historical metadata; supplied premises are synthetic, no actual report or grant
sourceReview: Actual locators read with source-specific gaps retained. Synthetic current/due state is independent.
legalValidity: Not evaluated; no product approval or market-access conclusion
actor: Applicant / certificate holder and applicable Canadian representative; CB scope unresolved
responsibility: Identify exact actor, conformity/authorization route, document/label/instruction duties and retention trigger. Engineer supplies evidence; actor release remains separate.
unresolved: [ "Q-CA-DOC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-CA-EMC: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-CA-EXP: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Q-CA-RF: Compatible question-specific review or retained restriction not recorded.", "Actual legal applicability and actor release", "Representative samples, methods and lab/body scope", "Final user instructions, labels and retention conditions", "Expansion parents and NI remain historical context; no new coverage asserted" ]
nextAction: Compare changed antenna and charger, assess representative verification, reconcile documents and obtain jurisdiction review before proposing baseline adoption.
owner: CA compliance reviewer + RF / EMC / exposure / document leads
dependencies: [ "DEP-Q-CA-RF-M-CA", "DEP-Q-CA-EMC-M-CA", "DEP-Q-CA-EXP-M-CA", "DEP-Q-CA-DOC-M-CA" ]
dates: { "publication": null, "entryIntoForce": null, "application": null, "transition": null, "actualAccess": "2026-09-10", "actualReview": "2026-09-10", "reviewDue": "2026-12-09", "actualEvaluation": "2026-09-10", "syntheticEvaluation": "2026-09-08", "syntheticReviewDue": "2026-12-07" }
questions: [ "Q-CA-RF", "Q-CA-EMC", "Q-CA-EXP", "Q-CA-DOC" ]

Historical parent IDs: teaching-node-v1, NEED-08, C-MARKET, M08-01-RAW-A, M08-01-DERIVED-A, P09-M01-C09-v1, P09-M01-C10-v1, P09-M02-U1-v1, P09-M02-U2-v1, P09-M02-U3-v1, P09-M02-U4-v1, P09-M02-U5-v1, P09-M02-U6-v1, P09-M02-U7-v1, P09-M02-U8-v1, P09-M03-EU-DE-v1, P09-M03-CH-v1, P09-M03-GB-v1, P09-M03-NI-v1, P09-M04-US-v1, P09-M04-CA-v1, P09-M05-AU-v1, P09-M05-BR-v1, P09-M05-JP-v1, P09-M05-KR-v1. These are provenance links, not evidence of transferred authorization. Model compliance-change-impact/2.0; rules p09-m06-impact-rules-v1; baseline p09-m06-baseline-v1; events p09-m06-change-events-v1.

References and source recheck record

Actual access and educational reading: 2026-09-10. Recheck before material use, on a product/source/activity change, and by the internal editorial target 2026-12-09. Unknown publication/operative dates are left unassigned; dates belong to the source or specific provision, not a global expiry. Real sources never receive fictional review attestations.

RED · Radio Equipment Directive 2014/53/EU
European Parliament / Council · Legislation; consolidation is a documentation aid. Consolidation 2026-05-30; current-version link checked. Relevant text read.
Read: Articles 10(4–5,11–12), 21(1–4); English. Manufacturers account for design and referenced-specification changes; documentation is maintained and risk/nonconformity has actor-specific follow-up. No actual product, national implementation, applicable method or release route selected.
Publication: 2014-05-22; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
EU-INDEX · Radio equipment — harmonised standards publications
European Commission · Official discovery index; summary has no legal effect. Live index lists amendment of 4 September 2026 / 2026/2003. Index read; linked new act unresolved.
Read: Publications in the Official Journal; summary status paragraph; English. Official citation updates must be checked independently of an existing measurement or a standards PDF. The linked 2026/2003 act redirected to an OJ landing page during this reading; operative annex and transition not reverified. No changed product requirement inferred.
Publication: unassigned; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
CH-LAW · Ordinance on Telecommunications Installations, SR 784.101.2
Swiss Federal Council / Fedlex · Swiss ordinance (OIT/TIO). State 15 August 2024; future 1 July 2028 version separately listed. Actual current-state text read in browser.
Read: Articles 14,16,23–24,36–38; Annex 3 II 2.2; French; English educational paraphrase. Documentation, change controls and actor follow-up are linked but distinct. Swiss retention anchors and series conditions need their own record. No Swiss category, designated method or national operating permission selected. English paraphrase is not a certified translation.
Publication: unassigned; entry into force: 2016-06-13; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
OFCOM · Technical documentation
Swiss OFCOM · Regulator guidance. Published 16 April 2019. Text read.
Read: Document scope and contents; English. Documentation connects design, production and operation to the conformity question. Telecommunications guidance does not cover every other applicable product law.
Publication: 2019-04-16; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
GB · Radio Equipment Regulations 2017: Great Britain
UK OPSS · Official guidance about legislation. March 2025 guidance; collection updated 16 December 2025. Guidance read; direct legislative recheck open.
Read: Section 4 items 1–9, manufacturer documentation, production and follow-up; English. The manufacturer’s production, documentation and follow-up responsibilities need their own GB record. Direct regulation 17 retrieval was blocked; legislative annotations not reverified. NI and actual marking eligibility remain separate.
Publication: unassigned; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
FCC · 47 CFR Part 2 Subpart J
FCC / eCFR · Federal rules in authoritative but unofficial eCFR compilation. Current endpoint accessed 2026-09-10; cross-reference amendment notices retained. Displayed provisions read; amendment applicability open.
Read: Sections 2.937, 2.938(a–b), 2.1043(a–b); English. Design/change records and technical change conditions matter. A software label alone cannot establish that RF emissions are unaffected. Amendment cross-references not independently resolved; no permissive-change class, filing route or grant decision assigned.
Publication: unassigned; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
RSP · RSP-100 — Certification of Radio Apparatus and Broadcasting Equipment
ISED · Official certification procedure. Issue 12, August 2019. Relevant text read.
Read: Sections 10, 10.1–10.2, 11.2–11.4; English. Change review uses Canadian product/firmware/host identity and its applicable procedure; a foreign change disposition is not a Canadian conclusion. Certificate holder, actual modified product, category and CB review are unresolved.
Publication: unassigned; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
RSS · RSS-Gen — General Requirements for Compliance of Radio Apparatus
ISED · Official technical specification. Issue 6, 30 July 2026, confirmed in live browser. Issue and relevant text read in browser.
Read: Sections 3.1, 4.2, 4.5, 8.1–8.2; report/sample identity and modification paragraphs; English. Report identity, actual specimen configuration and continuing records remain material after certification or modification. Band-specific RSS, transitions for a real activity, lab scope and actual Canadian route remain open.
Publication: 2026-07-30; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
JCGM · JCGM 106:2012 — Measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment
JCGM / BIPM · Metrology guidance; not a product limit. JCGM 106:2012; discovered through current Guides in Metrology. Actual PDF text read.
Read: Sections 8.2–8.3, decision rules and guard bands; English. A decision rule determines how uncertainty and an acceptance boundary are used. The lesson’s inclusive interval screen is a declared internal rule, not a universal conformity procedure.
Publication: unassigned; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.
NIST · TN 1297, section 6: Expanded Uncertainty
NIST · Metrology guidance. 1994 edition; web section read via current TN index. Text read.
Read: Sections 6.1–6.3; English. Expanded uncertainty uses a coverage factor with stated interpretation and assumptions. A new configuration may require a new uncertainty evaluation; k alone is not a guaranteed confidence level.
Publication: unassigned; entry into force: unassigned; application / transition: unresolved / unresolved. Actual access/evaluation 2026-09-10. Owner: relevant source reviewer; trigger: changed source, product or activity and before use.

Further study: BIPM Guides in Metrology, NIST TN 1297, measurement traceability and uncertainty, and the systems architecture review.